Australian War Crimes in Afghanistan



39 people were murdered by Australian special forces personnel, predominantly from the Special Air Service regiment. None were alleged to have occurred in circumstances in which the intent of the perpetrator was unclear, confused or mistaken.  It includes alleged instances in which newer patrol members were coerced to shoot a prisoner to achieve that soldier’s first kill in an appalling practice known as blooding. Weapons and radios were reportedly planted to support claims that people killed were enemy killed in action. Those killed were prisoners, farmers or other civilians.

Military sociologist Samantha Crompvoets, who was tasked with examining special forces culture and began to hear disturbing allegations of war crimes.

One soldier told her:

“Guys just had this blood lust,” he said. “Psychos. Absolute psychos. And we bred them.”

She heard one allegation that two 14-year-old boys were stopped by SAS, who decided they might be Taliban sympathisers. Their throats were slit.

“The rest of the troop then had to ‘clean up the mess’ by finding others to help dispose of the bodies,” Crompvoets reported. “In the end, the bodies were bagged and thrown in a nearby river.”

The Privileged Princesses

 


12. Princess Beatrice of York

Net worth: $5 million

Country: England

Princess Beatrice is the older daughter of The Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York, and one of the Queen of England’s grandchildren. Princess Beatrice is seventh in the line of succession to the throne. 

11. Princess Eugenie of York

Net worth: $5 million

Country: England

Princess Eugenie is the younger daughter of The Duke of York and Sarah, Duchess of York, and is the Queen of England’s granddaughter. She is eighth in line for the throne.

10. Crown Princess Victoria

Net worth: $10 million

Country: Sweden

Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden, is the oldest daughter of the King and Queen of Sweden. 

9. Kate Middleton

Net worth: $10 million

Country: England

Princess Kate, also known as Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, married Prince William in 2011 

8. Princess Madeleine

Net worth: $10 million

Country: Sweden

Princess Madeleine is the youngest daughter of the King and Queen of Sweden.

7. Princess Sofia

Net worth: $10 million (based on Prince Carl Philip’s net worth)

Country: Sweden

Princess Sofia is the wife of Prince Carl Philip. 

6. Princess Anne

Net worth: $30 million

Country: England

Princess Anne is the only daughter of the Queen of England and is currently 12th in line to the throne. Anne, whose full title is Princess Royal.

5. Caroline, Princess of Hanover

Net worth: $100 million

Country: Monaco

Caroline, Princess of Hanover, also known as Princess Caroline of Monaco, is the oldest daughter of Grace Kelly and Prince Rainier. 

4. Princess Stéphanie

Net worth: $100 million

Country: Monaco

Princess Stéphanie is the youngest child of Grace Kelly and Prince Rainier. 

3. Princess Charlene

Net worth: $150 million

Country: Monaco

2. Princess Gesine

Net worth: $1.05 billion

Country: Italy

Princess Gesine and her brother Prince Jonathan Doria Pamphilj were adopted from an orphanage as babies by an Italian princess, Orietta Doria Pamphilj, Principessa di Melfi, and were raised in the Palazzo Doria in Rome

1. Princess Charlotte

Net worth: $4.2 billion (based on value to U.K. economy)

Country: England

Princess Charlotte is only 3 years old, but she’s already worth billions, Marie Claire U.K. reported. 

Korean Car Workers Strike

 GM workers have been staging two, four-hour strikes daily since Oct. 30 as they demand an end to a wage freeze put in place after the 2018 deal that saved the Korean operations from bankruptcy.

General Motors has issued its strongest warning yet that persistent industrial unrest eventually could drive it out of South Korea.

GM builds as many as 500,000 vehicles a year in South Korea, shipping many to the United States including the popular Chevrolet Trailblazer SUV. The automaker employs about 12,000 people in the country. GM management wants a two-year labor deal instead of the usual one-year agreement, and have offered union members a signing bonus of 8 million won ($7,230) each for 2020 and 2021.

The union, however, wants to stick to a one-year deal and yearly performance bonus of 22 million won each, as well as continued operation at both plants in Bupyeong.

“We are not only striking over wage issues, but also over job security at our No. 2 plant in Bupyeong, which hires about 1,200 workers,” union official Jung Jai-heon said.

Some current and former subcontract workers are also demanding to be hired as full-time staff with the same pay and benefits.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gm-southkorea-labor-exclusive/exclusive-gm-warns-labor-unrest-making-south-korea-untenable-idUSKBN27Y0NR

Downward Mobile

 One in five people in the UK have nominally fallen down the social pecking order because they work in a lower-status job than their parents – with mothers, non-graduates and some black and minority ethnic groups more likely to find themselves “downwardly mobile”, according to the study for the Social Mobility CommissionHaving become established in a lower-status occupation, most are likely to stay there,  a finding it says is likely to confirm a growing sense among the public that society is becoming less fair, with opportunities for advancement less equal.

“While there is a lot of attention on upwards social mobility, much less attention is paid to downward social mobility,” said Ben Page, the chief executive of Ipsos Mori, which carried out the research.

Education and affluence provided a buttress against downward mobility, the study found. Graduates were least likely to move into lower-status jobs, especially those who were the offspring of doctors, lawyers, teachers and scientists, and who could draw on parental professional networks and the “bank of Mum and Dad”.

The children of firefighters, police officers and nurses were most likely to be in a lower occupational class than their parents. Women with caring responsibilities often found themselves downwardly mobile because they were either excluded from, or opted to bale out of, high-status jobs because of inflexible, highly competitive work environments that they were unable to combine with bringing up their children.

Black African, Pakistani, Asian and Bangladeshi migrants – often coming to the UK with degrees and professional qualifications – were more likely than their white British counterparts to be downwardly mobile after coming up against “opaque hiring and progression practices that seem to exclude them at every turn”, the study said.

Downward mobility has been on the increase in the UK in recent decades, the study says. While 56% of sons born by 1975 went on to earn more than their fathers, this had dropped to just 33% by 1985, with the majority of sons in recent cohorts earning less than the previous generation.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/nov/18/one-in-five-people-in-uk-in-lower-status-jobs-than-parents-study

What a Xmas it will be for many

 



Half a million children in London will go hungry in the run up to Christmas if nothing is done to help them, Andrew Read, head of education at London South Bank University, a child poverty expert, has warned.

Already, 400,000 children go hungry in the capital. He said the number of children living in food poverty will rise by 100,000 as a result of the pandemic unless urgent action is taken. “This is really a tragedy.” 

Mr Read said this “huge figure”  could have a catastrophic impact on education in in the capital, with academic improvements set back by a generation as children struggle to learn without having had enough food. “The issue is massive. We know that food insecurity and hunger has an impact on children’s academic progress, and unless something is done about this now, this is going to set back pupils’ progress for potentially a generation.” He explained, “It is really important that there is action to address issues around food poverty and food insecurity in households. Food poverty has a long-term impact on young people. A healthy diet doesn’t only mean children will do better at school but children who are not well fed are more likely to develop mental health problems and stress, and as they get older they are more likely to suffer from diseases such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes and obesity.”

Research shows that when pupils are not hungry, there’s an improvement in levels of pupil concentration in class, readiness to learn and behaviour. Mr Read said that when children are hungry it is harder for them to concentrate and they are tired, which affects their ability to reach their potential. “That is what’s really sad,” he added.

The surging rate of hunger is mirrored across the country – with more than 3 million people reporting that they had gone hungry during the first lockdown. The number of adults who are food insecure in Britain is estimated to have quadrupled due to the pandemic. During the first lockdown 16.2 per cent of adults said they experienced food insecurity. In normal times, 3.8 per cent of adults in Britain are believed to experience it.

As Christmas approaches, the stress that families are under will increase. He said: “Christmas has its own layers – the expectations, what it’s meant to mean and how it impacts on family life. It is already going to be different this year because of the lockdown. If on top of that you are worried about what is going to happen to your children during the holidays if you can’t feed them properly, that just adds layers of anxiety and insecurity.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/helpthehungry/help-the-hungry-child-food-poverty-hunger-london-christmas-south-bank-b1723555.html

The Vaccine Belongs to Humanity

 

First Pfizer and now Moderna announce the development of coronavirus vaccine which is effective but will it be free and available to all? The good thing about Moderna’s is that the vaccine can be stored in a regular refrigerator for a month—as opposed to Pfizer which needs special low, low temp cooling.

Much of Moderna’s doses have already been claimed by wealthy countries. According to Global Justice Now, 780 million doses have been sold to rich governments, or 78% of the billion doses the company says it can produce by the end up next year.

Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, explained,  “Moderna’s is predicted to be the most expensive potential vaccine on the market, at around $35 a dose, even though it has been made with vast public support. The U.S. government has spent over $1 billion in direct support alone. What’s more, well over 78% of what Moderna is likely to produce has already been sold to very wealthy countries.” Dearden went on to say,  “We appreciate that Moderna has said it won’t enforce patents as long the pandemic continues, but this alone is not sufficient to ensure this vaccine benefits humanity. This is truly a taxpayer funded vaccine and should be placed in the public sphere through the World Health Organization so the whole world can benefit.”

Amnesty International detailed in a statement that the United States has paid for 100 million doses from Moderna, with an option of 500 million more, while Canada has ordered 56 million, Japan has ordered 50 million, and the European Commission completed talks with the company for up to 160 million.

“Having already sold most of its potential 2021 vaccine supply to rich countries, Moderna must follow through on its promise to allow others to make the vaccine, and provide the knowledge and technology to do so, once the vaccine has proven to be safe and effective,” declared Stephen Cockburn, head of Amnesty’s Economic and Social Justice Program. Cockburn argued that “companies like Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech have a responsibility to respect human rights, and they should play a leading role towards a global solution to Covid-19 by sharing and ensuring affordable prices. They must not act in a way that allows governments to hoard vaccines for a privileged few. “We can only put an end to Covid-19 if companies ensure that those most in need of life-saving vaccines are not left behind…”

Peter Maybarduk, director of Public Citizen’s Access to Medicines program, put it : “This is the people’s vaccine. The NIH’s vaccine. It is not merely Moderna’s vaccine. Federal scientists helped invent it and taxpayers are funding its development. We all have played a role. It should belong to humanity.”

No more profit before people.

From here

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/11/16/it-should-belong-humanity-funded-public-promising-moderna-results-bolster-global

The Sweaters and the Sweated



 Indian workers in factories supplying the supermarket chains Marks and Spencer, Tesco and Sainsbury’s, and the fashion brand Ralph Lauren, told the BBC they are being subjected to exploitative conditions. These kinds of brands do not own or operate factories in India, which creates distance between them and working conditions there, but one owner of a clothing supplier – who did not want to be named – told the BBC that if brands push for cheaper clothes it can leave suppliers with no choice but to cut corners to meet orders.

“It’s the brand who wants to maximize the profit. So, they push you to a level wherein you have to do the exploitation in order to survive,” he said. The owner, who used to supply a major UK brand not mentioned in this story, described some factory audit processes as a “sham”. “The factory is aware when the auditors are coming, so they keep everything in perfect condition before,” he said. “The moment the audit is over, everything goes back to normal, which means exploitation and non compliance.” He said that poor checks and balances, combined with a lack of responsibility by the brands, makes it hard to stamp out that exploitation. “It is the way of working in the textile industry, it’s just not India, it’s everywhere.”

Women working at a Ralph Lauren supplier said they had been forced to stay overnight to complete orders, sometimes requiring them to sleep on the factory floor.

“We’re made to work continuously, often through the night, sleeping at 3am then waking up by 5am for another full day,” one woman said in an interview. “Our bosses don’t care. They’re only bothered about production,” she said.

Workers at the supermarket supplier said they had been made to endure conditions which would be unacceptable for staff employed by the same brands in the UK.

“We don’t get toilet breaks, we don’t get time to drink water on shift. We barely get time to eat lunch,” one woman said.

She said a manager would sometimes stand behind staff in the canteen and blow a whistle to send them back to work.

Another employee said staff were forced to work overtime and prevented from going home until extra work was finished.

“They’ve increased our workload. We’re forced to stay late to finish it – or they yell at us and threaten to fire us. We’re scared as we don’t want to lose our jobs.”

Several women who spoke to the BBC described a climate of fear at the factory supplying Ralph Lauren. They said managers did not give them notice to work additional hours, instead threatening them with the sack if they were unable to stay on.

“The supervisor always shouts at us,” one woman said. “If we make any error in stitching, I’ll be taken to the master who is very scary. The master will start swearing and shouting at us. It’s a terrifying experience”

Another woman, a widow who supports her family financially, said: “They ask us to work so late I can’t even feed my children at night. They shouldn’t treat us like slaves, they should give us respect,” she said.

The women working at these garment factories all live in poverty in a rural area of South India. The charity Action Aid, which supports more than 1,200 female garment workers across 45 villages in this specific region, told the BBC that forced overtime, verbal abuse and poor working conditions were routine at the factories in question.

Allegations such as these are not confined to the garment industry. Low wages and weak labour laws have long made India an attractive place for foreign brands looking to outsource work. Unions are rare and virtually absent in the private sector, making informal and contract workers especially vulnerable. While inspections are mandatory, rampant corruption and a sluggish system has meant that factories are rarely held to account for breaking the law. The claims appear to violate India’s Factories Act, which states that no worker should exceed more than 48 hours a week (or 60 hours with overtime), nor should they be made to work for more than nine hours in one day. The law also states that women should only work night shifts if they choose to do so.

The garment industry draws more attention because it’s driven by exports and counts some of the world’s biggest brands as among its clients. India is the world’s second-largest manufacturer and exporter of garments after China. India’s garment makers directly employ about 12.9 million people in factories and millions more outside, including their own homes, according to a 2019 report that investigated working conditions in the sector.



And as profits are squeezed, women often find themselves losing out. Payslips seen by the BBC show women working in garment factories can earn as little as £2.50 per day, making items which, in some cases, sell for hundreds of pounds. More than 40% of workers surveyed by Action Aid India reported that their average monthly income was in the range of Rs. 2000-5000. (£20-£50).

“Women are undervalued and underpaid throughout global supply chains,” said Ether Mariaselvam, the regional manager at Action Aid’s Chennai office.

All of the workers who spoke to the BBC described living in impoverished conditions and said they struggled to survive on their salaries. One woman working at the Ralph Lauren supplier said she supported her entire family on a wage of around 6,000 rs (£61 per month), after deductions.

The Asia Floor Wage Alliance organisation which advocates for higher salaries for garment workers in the region, has set a monthly living wage in India of at least 18,727 rs (£190). But according to payslips seen by the BBC, neither of the factories we investigated appeared to be paying their workers anything close to the Asia Floor Wage Alliance recommended minimum amount.

Anna Bryher, from the advocacy group Labour behind the Label, said it was the responsibility of brands to ensure fair and safe working conditions.

“If you’re a brand and you’re making clothing in different countries around the world then you need to look at whether you’re paying your workers enough to live with dignity,” she said. “It’s your responsibility as the company at the top of the supply chain to know what is happening in your supply chain and to make sure that it’s fair.”

Local labour laws were not doing enough to address exploitation, the push for change needs to come from the brands themselves,” argues Vivek Soundararajan, a senior lecturer at Bath University who researches global supply chains. “Most checks and balances do not include workers voices, they do not include what workers actually need,” he said. “I think the brand should take the full responsibility … They may not run the factory, but they get all the benefits.”



https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54960346





The Grenfell Fake Safety Tests

 Executives who sold combustible insulation for use on Grenfell Tower perpetrated a “fraud on the market” by rigging a fire test and making “misleading” claims about it, the public inquiry has heard.

Celotex, a subsidiary of the French construction materials company Saint-Gobain, behaved in a “completely unethical” way, admitted Jonathan Roper, its former assistant product manager. Roper worked on two fire tests of the foam panels and subsequent sales plans as the company tried to grab a slice of a £10m-a-year insulation foam market.

In the Grenfell fire on 14 June 2017, the foam, known as RS5000, fuelled the flames and released toxic gases and smoke. The foam was withdrawn from the market nine days later.

Roper said the firm had been “dishonest” by “over-engineering” a cladding fire safety test to achieve a pass. A first test in February 2014 failed in 26 minutes, with flames engulfing the rig. But after changing some of the materials used around the insulation, including adding concealed fire-retardant panels, a second test three months later passed and was used to market the foam boards as safe for high-rise buildings.

“Did you realise at the time that … this would be a fraud on the market?” asked Millett.

“Yes, I did,” replied Roper.” Asked if he could have gone to the senior management with his concerns, he replied that they were all in the meeting about the marketing strategy. “I was 22 or 23, first job, I thought this was standard practice, albeit it did sit very uncomfortably with me.”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/16/fire-test-for-grenfell-foam-cladding-panels-was-rigged-admits-ex-employee