Life expectancy in the United States dropped a staggering one year during the first half of 2020 as the coronavirus pandemic caused its first wave of deaths. Minorities suffered the biggest impact, with Black Americans losing nearly three years and Hispanics, nearly two years. Black people now lag white people by six years in life expectancy, reversing a trend that had been bringing their numbers closer since 1993. Between 2019 and the first half of 2020, life expectancy decreased 2.7 years for Black people, to 72. It dropped 1.9 years for Hispanics, to 79.9, and 0.8 years for white people, to 78. 

“This is a huge decline,” said Robert Anderson, who oversees the numbers for the CDC. “You have to go back to World War II, the 1940s, to find a decline like this.”

“What is really quite striking in these numbers is that they only reflect the first half of the year … I would expect that these numbers would only get worse,” said Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, a health equity researcher and dean at the University of California, San Francisco. “Black and Hispanic communities throughout the United States have borne the brunt of this pandemic,” Bibbins-Domingo said.

 Health experts say it shows the profound impact of COVID-19, not just on deaths directly due to infection but also from heart disease, cancer and other conditions.

Life expectancy is how long a baby born today can expect to live, on average. In the first half of last year, that was 77.8 years for Americans overall, down one year from 78.8 in 2019. For males it was 75.1 years and for females, 80.5 years.

Dr. Otis Brawley, a cancer specialist and public health professor at Johns Hopkins University, said, overall, the drop in life expectancy is more evidence of “our mishandling of the pandemic. “We have been devastated by the coronavirus more so than any other country. We are 4% of the world’s population, more than 20% of the world’s coronavirus deaths.” 

US life expectancy drops a year in pandemic, most since WWII (apnews.com)

USA is the most expensive country in the world to have a baby, there is no way of knowing the bill in advance, and you can potentially be charged just for holding your newborn baby  (You can be charged $40 )

 It’s the only developed country without mandated paid maternity leave; in some states, however, short-term disability insurance covers your income for a few weeks while you recover from the birth.

Even with decent insurance, you can expect to pay a few thousand dollars out-of-pocket for an uncomplicated birth. Indeed, the cost of delivering a regular American baby is more than that of delivering a Royal baby in the UK.

 Nobody in the US healthcare system can ever tell you how much anything costs. They just tell you to call your health insurance company, who tell you to call the hospital’s billing department, who put you on hold then tell you to call your insurance company. Three weeks later, you get a bill. Even though your hospital is covered by your health insurance, one of the specialists who comes into contact with your newborn might not be. The paediatrician may be out of network so not recognised by her insurance provider and so is extra.

80% of medical bills contain errors and these almost always seem to be over-charging rather than under-charging you. 

Despite getting massively marked-up care – the USA has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world.

My partner is pregnant – and the cost of giving birth in the US is stressing me out | Pregnancy | The Guardian

Workers at fast-food restaurant chains in 15 cities around the US went on strike on Tuesday demanding a raise in their minimum wage to $15 an hour.

The workers at McDonald’s, Burger King and Wendy’s, joined by home care and nursing home workers, took action.

Strikes occurred in Charleston, South Carolina; Chicago; Flint and Detroit, Michigan; Raleigh and Durham, North Carolina; Houston; Miami, Orlando, and Tampa, Florida; St. Louis; Oakland, Sacramento, and San Jose, California; and Milwaukee. 

“We hear you out there applauding essential workers. We see the big show you make of thanking us. But to be honest, that hasn’t translated into changes for my life. We were living on a razor’s edge long before Covid-19 hit South Carolina. And we’re living on it still,” said Taiwanna Milligan, a McDonald’s worker in Charleston who makes $8.75 an hour after working at the restaurant chain for eight years.

Ieishia Franceis has worked at Freddy’s Frozen Custards in west Durham, North Carolina since July 2020 and makes $9.20 an hour, explained, “Sometimes businesses get so caught up in doing business that they forget who runs their businesses. We’re going to keep fighting and not going to stop until we get all the equality we’re fighting for.” 

 47% of essential workers are in occupations where the median wage is currently less than $15 an hour. 

US workers go on strike in 15 cities to demand $15-an-hour minimum wage | Minimum wage | The Guardian

 The pandemic had infected at least 109 million people worldwide, causing over 2.4 million deaths as of mid-February. Global needs for the vaccine now greatly exceed available supply.

Vaccine developers’ refusal to share publicly funded vaccine research findings is stalling broader, affordable vaccinations which would more rapidly contain COVID-19 contagion. Avoidable delays in preventive vaccination are imposing terrible burdens on the world economy and human welfare, with economic disruption demanding more relief and recovery measures. By the end of 2021, total global capacity of the 13 leading COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers would still be well short of the needs of the world’s almost 7.7 billion people. Even if they all produce at maximum capacity, a fifth of the world’s population would not have access until 2022.

National capacities to cope with the pandemic have been largely determined by means and power. Thus, access to COVID-19 tests, treatments, personal protective equipment and other pandemic supplies has been severely lacking in most African and other poor countries.

At current vaccination rates, it would take “not one or two years, but six years” to reach 75% global coverage, currently considered the minimum to achieve ‘herd immunity’ against COVID-19.

Patent protections, vaccine production constraints and the rich country scramble will deprive more than 85 poor countries of public access to vaccines before 2023. As of 5 February, not a single dose had been administered in 130 countries with 2.5 billion people.

Of the more than 131 million doses available by 8 February, the US, China, the EU and the UK had 78%, while Africa had 0.2%! Meanwhile, the African Union has only ordered less than half of what it needs to reach herd immunity, i.e., just 670 million doses. Meanwhile, besides Brazil, other Latin American countries only have 150 million doses for less than a quarter of their population.

Rich countries continue to oppose the South African-Indian proposal to temporarily suspend relevant provisions of the 1994 World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) to effectively block rapid scaling up of generic vaccine production, mainly due to vaccine suppliers’ profit maximisation, also limiting supplies and access. Meanwhile, rich countries’ grossly excessive vaccine purchases can vaccinate their residents several times over.  Cross-border enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) is relatively recent. Big Pharma successfully lobbied their governments for TRIPS inclusion in the 1994 WTO founding documents. This greatly strengthened and extended IPRs transnationally.

The US will soon have enough to vaccinate its population twice over, while Canada and Australia have booked enough to protect residents several times over. Exceptionally, New Zealand – which has also ordered several times its population’s needs.  Middle-income countries have joined the scramble, making onerous direct deals with vaccine suppliers, typically on worse terms than if they had bargained collectively. Unsurprisingly, vaccine prices vary considerably, by more than 12-fold, from US$6 to US$74 per dose.

As countries have not published contract details, acceding to vaccine suppliers’ terms, lack of transparency has enabled abuses. And when forced to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests, documents are heavily redacted before release. Such limited transparency enables big power ‘vaccine nationalism’ impairs others’ access. Thus, following its spat with AstraZeneca, the European Commission (EC) banned vaccine exports to most countries outside the EU. Now, as these non-transparent deals are disputed, European politicians are threatening ‘patent grabs’. EU President Charles Michel has warned of “urgent measures” demanding compulsory licensing, provided for by the European Treaty.

This would require vaccine developers to facilitate generic production, which the developing country-backed TRIPS temporary waiver proposal seeks for all countries. Nevertheless, the EU, other rich countries and their allies still oppose the request to enable rapid scaling-up of affordable vaccine supplies.

To accelerate vaccine development, expenses and risks have been mainly borne by governments, rather than by developers or private finance. The six top candidate vaccine developers have already received over US$12 billion of public money.  Moderna received US$955 million for research and development plus a premarket purchase commitment of US$1.53 billion. In Europe, Pfizer/BioNTech got €375 million from the German government and another €100 million for debt refinancing from the European Investment Bank. Yet, despite massive public financing, vaccine developers retain the IP monopoly right to profit. Thus, the prospect of huge gains from 2021 vaccine sales revenue of almost US$40 billion is delaying progress against COVID-19. AstraZeneca promised Oxford University not to profit off any COVID-19 vaccines “for the duration of the pandemic”. However, its contracts allow it to declare the pandemic over as early as mid-2021. It could then charge higher prices for vaccines developed with public money for the university.

Vaccines produced generically at greater scale will be far more affordable, enabling more rapid containment of the contagion, infections, deaths and disruptions. Until herd immunity is achieved nationally and globally, priority in allocation should be on the basis of urgent need, rather than ability to pay or political muscle.  The TRIPS waiver proposal, still blocked by rich country governments at the WTO would enable all countries to affordably make or buy ‘generic’ vaccines. This would most effectively expedite containing the pandemic with the least loss of lives and livelihoods.

IP, Vaccine Imperialism Cause Death and Suffering, Delay Recovery | Inter Press Service (ipsnews.net)

  Revealed in a new IPS briefing paper, the richest .01 percent of Americans, about 33,000 today, now pay just one-sixth of what they used to pay in tax, when measured as a percentage of their total wealth.

The top .01 percent in America is a phenomenally wealthy group. Even during America’s most egalitarian periods, the average member of the top .01 percent held over 200 times the wealth of the average American. Today, the wealth of the average top .01 percenter is nearly 1,000 times that of the average American and is closing in on one billion dollars.

Taxes on the Rich: One-Sixth of What They Used to Be – Consortiumnews

 Now online, a new audio-only talk

Speaker: Andy Thomas

Meeting held online via Discord, 18th December 2020

Celebrations and Socialism

 A “perfect storm” of low wages, cramped housing and failures of the £22bn test-and-trace scheme has led to “stubbornly high” coronavirus rates in England’s most deprived communities, an unpublished government report by the Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC) has found.

A classified analysis produced last month, concluded that “unmet financial needs” meant people in poorer areas were less likely to be able to self-isolate because they could not afford to lose income.

In two of the UK’s worst-hit areas, Blackburn-with-Darwen and Leicester, the study found that more people seeking financial help to self-isolate had been rejected than accepted. It said: “This could increase the likelihood for individuals to be unable to comply with self-isolation requirements as a result of their unmet needs.”

JBC, a government agency set up last May, concluded that “interconnected factors” such as deprivation, poor housing and work conditions, and delays in the test-and-trace system, were all “likely to be significant contributors” to the high coronavirus rates in some areas. It found evidence that areas with a higher proportion of workers in public-facing roles, such as health and social care, taxi drivers or supermarket workers, were likely to experience high infection rates.

It said: “Having high numbers of people in high-risk occupation is not specific to just these enduring areas. This in isolation is not a reason for enduring transmission, but rather along with a range of other factors, overlaid, that create the ‘perfect storm’.”

It said that “existing socioeconomic inequality” had left black, Asian and minority ethnic communities at greater exposure to Covid-19 as they were more likely to live in cramped and multigenerational housing in deprived areas and hold public-facing jobs. Despite this, the report noted: “Guidance around how to self-isolate safely in high-density housing does not appear to exist for England as it does for Scotland and Northern Ireland.”

The report said there was no single cause for enduring Covid transmission “and therefore no silver bullet to resolve the issue”, adding: “Instead, it is likely to be due to a unique mix of factors in each location eg many of the factors are also interlinked and aligned: deprivation – employment – household composition.”

England’s poorest areas hit by Covid ‘perfect storm’ – leaked report | World news | The Guardian

 “We have inflation, we are seeing inflation, we are concerned about inflation. We have to mitigate that inflation, or at least part of it, with hedges and with efficiencies in the factories,” Kraft Heinz Chief Executive Miguel Patricio told Reuters.

Other major food companies, including Unilever, have also signaled higher prices due to global commodity inflation.

“We’ve got some inflationary pressures coming forward. And we do expect mid-to-high single-digit commodity inflation in the first half. So we have to be at the top of our game in pricing going forward,” Unilever Chief Financial Officer Graeme Pitkethly said on a recent earnings call.

Prices this year on some products that use wheat, sugar and other commodities that are becoming increasingly expensive due to high demand. Prices for commodities like sugar, wheat and soy are surging.

U.S. consumers on average paid 3.7% more for food consumed at home in January than they did a year earlier, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. Year-over-year increases in food prices have topped 3.5% each month since last April, the longest such stretch in nearly a decade.

The food producers are not the only U.S. manufacturers beginning to respond to sharply higher input costs – the highest in a decade in some national surveys – with price increases of their own. The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s monthly factory survey for January showed prices received by manufacturers for their goods rising by the most since 1989.

Exclusive: Kraft Heinz, Conagra may raise some product prices as grains, edible oil costs surge | Reuters

 In a guest post, Pramod Ranjan of Assam Central University reflects on the new annual budget of the Indian government and how it ignores the plight of the country’s poor in the wake of Covid-19.

Note: A lakh is 100,000. A crore is 100 lakh, i.e., 10 million.

Like in most parts of the world, life was on a stand-still in India for the past almost one year, courtesy of the Covid-19 pandemic. Now the poor and the middle class are in a miserable state. Crores have lost their jobs and lakhs have faced savage reductions in their income. Amid this crisis, the Government of India presented its annual budget in Parliament on February 1, 2021. 

Based on the statistics on global hunger, published by the UN during the lockdown, Oxfam had estimated that by the end of 2020, hunger linked to the lockdown may start claiming the life of 6,000–12,000 people every day. The naked dance of death has commenced and without much fuss it is spreading over a larger and larger area. Deaths due to poverty far exceed deaths attributable to Covid-19.1

Dark clouds of famine, described as ‘Covid-19 famine’, are hanging over the world. The United Nation World Food Program (WFP) has been consistently warning about it. It is believed that the impending famine would be one of the worst over the last 100 years and would spell calamity for the poor and the developing countries as also the war zones in the world. It is apprehended that this famine may lead to India emerging as a new epicenter of hunger. According to a survey conducted in December 2020, more than half of India’s people are eating less in comparison with the pre-Covid days. And most of them are Dalits [untouchables] and Adivasis [tribal people].2

What is even worse is that India’s intellectual class is totally oblivious to the spectre of death haunting the poor. The sickening odour of the rotting dead is not reaching the noses of the Indian media, social media and those in public life. It seems that our centuries-old heritage of social disparity and the economic inequality triggered by the globalization of economy have deepened the social fissures to such an extent that “we” are totally disinterested in what is happening to “them”.  

And this disinterest is very palpable in India’s budget for 2021–2022 and the discussions and comments on it in the media. 

The budget is focused on recompensing the losses suffered by the economy due to the pandemic. For this, it is proposed to sell off national assets to the capitalists. Media is obsessed with discussing only this aspect of the budget. Some say the decision is proper and necessary and the next logical step in the process of “economic reforms.” Others say that the government was out to sell the country. 

In her budget speech, the finance minister dwelt in detail on the budgetary provisions to ensure availability of Covid-19 vaccine in the country and the steps to be taken for making India a digital economy. The pros and cons of these moves are also being debated and discussed. 



But nobody is asking why the budget does not make even a cursory reference to the lockdown-induced starvation and the famine that is knocking on the door. No one is querying why there is not a single word in the budget speech about the economic inequalities that have triggered this crisis.

A couple of days before the presentation of the budget, Oxfam released a report titled The Inequality Virus. The report says that the coronavirus pandemic has increased inequality in almost every country. The wealth of the 1,000 super-rich of the world has grown by leaps and bounds during the pandemic. The share market did tumble in the initial days of the lockdown, leading to notional losses for the moneybags. But not only did the fortunes of the top-1,000 billionaires of the world reached to their pre-pandemic highs soon3 but they earned more than what they had earned in the past several years.  It was the exercise to build a digital world that led to this growing concentration of wealth in a few hands. The businesses in the health and the vaccine production sectors made tons of money. According to the Oxfam report, the lockdown period saw a jump of 19% in the wealth of the super-rich. Jeff Bezos, the richest person on the earth, became worth 185.5 billion US dollars. On 18 January 2021, Elon Musk’s total wealth was estimated at 179.2 billion dollars. The net wealth of Larry Page and Sergey Brin, founders of Google, and Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft, grew by 15 billion US dollars since March 2020. Eric Yuan, the CEO and founder of Zoom was richer by 2.58 billion dollars during this period.

There were eye-popping changes in the economic scene in India, too. Indian billionaires raked in big moolah during the lockdown. They reaped the benefits of the subsidy schemes announced by the government to give a boost to the economy. Locked up in their homes, the people handed over whatever little they had, to the big industrialists. Currently, India has 119 billionaires, including Mukesh Ambani, Gautam Adani, Shiv Nadar, Cyrus Poonawala, Uday Kotak, Azim Premji, Sunil Mittal, Radhakishen Damani, Kumarmanglam Birla and Laxmi Mittal. 

During this period, Mukesh Ambani emerged as the richest man in India and Asia. During the pandemic period, he earned an average of Rs 90 crore per hour when 24% of Indians were earning barely Rs 3,000 per month. 

The cumulative wealth of this 119 super-rich went up by 35% in this period. Together, they earned Rs 13 lakh crore. What this amount means is evident by the fact that if it were to be equally distributed among the 14 crore poorest Indians, each one of them would get Rs one lakh. The lockdown earnings of Mukesh Ambani could have sufficed to keep the 40 crore persons in the informal sector who lost their jobs during this period, above the poverty line for at least five months.4 

On the other hand, the lockdown pushed more than 12 crore Indians on the verge of starvation. The middle classes were unable to pay back their bank loans and lakhs of families, sick of harassment at the hands of their creditors, contemplated mass suicide. The government ignored the demand for extension of the moratorium on payment of EMIs. Before the budget, the government had made it clear to the Supreme Court that it was with the creditors. Shrugging off its responsibility, the government told the court that extension of the moratorium would erode the faith of the capitalists who have invested their money in the banks. There were reports of dozens of indebted families committing suicide and lakhs of creditors facing aggressive and abusive behaviour and even manhandling at the hands of the recovery agents of the banks and other financial institutions. 

The budget is totally silent on this issue.

A deafening silence 

Not only the government but the newspapers are also mum. And this is nothing new. The newspapers have been giving a short-shrift to issues related to economic inequality since the 1990s when India switched to a market-centric economy. Till the year 2000, India had just nine billionaires. By 2017, their numbers had swollen to 101, and as mentioned earlier, now there are 119 such worthies. According to a study, in 2017, the 1% of top-rich held 73% of the country’s national wealth. In 2018-19, the total wealth of these moneybags was more than the country’s annual budget. During the Covid calamity, they not only continued to fill their coffers without a shred of guilt or shame but institutions under their control used the pandemic to blackmail the people. 

The 10% of Indians at the top of the socio-economic pyramid control 77% of the national wealth, while the remaining 90% have to manage with just 23%. 

One very potent way of reducing this inequality could have been imposing wealth tax and making sure that all the concerned pay up. This would have made good the losses due to the lockdown. The super-rich should have been taxed on the basis of their annual income and an additional cess should have been imposed on them based on their total wealth. Instead, in the name of disinvestment, the government decided to hand over the country’s national wealth to these moneybags. This is akin to worsening the problem instead of resolving it.  

New York, California, Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington and many other states in the USA are planning to impose additional taxes on the rich.5

A Bill has been recently introduced in the legislature of the Washington State to impose Wealth Tax on the rich to repair the economy ravaged by the lockdown.6 If this bill is cleared, those owning property worth more than one billion dollars would be required to pay a 1% wealth tax. That would yield an income of 2.5 billion dollars, which would be used for providing financial assistance to the low- and the middle-income households and extending credit facilities to businesses with poor profit margins. It would also be used for education, children’s welfare and for bettering public health, public housing and public security. Like India, Washington, too, has around 100 billionaires of which 13 are super-rich. They include the likes of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer and MacKenzie Scott. The Bill has been moved primarily to tax them. Of the revenue expected from the new tax, 97% would come from them. This super-rich earned upwards of 151 billion dollars during the lockdown period (March 2020 – January 21) and their total wealth went up by around 41%. The people of Washington, supporting the decision to impose wealth tax on them, say that the earnings can cover the shortfall of three billion dollars in the state’s budget 50 times over. And despite the tax, the super-rich would continue to be as rich as they were before the pandemic struck.7 The demand for taxing them has assumed the form of a movement and it is hoped that the bill would be cleared by the legislature soon. 

You might remember that some dynamic and sensitive officers of the Indian Revenue Service (IRS) had suggested a similar course of action during the initial days of the pandemic. That was the time when lakhs of migrant farmers were trudging to their villages from industrial towns like Delhi, Mumbai and Surat and there were reports that fatigue had claimed the lives of hundreds of them on the way. Amid this came a piece of news that seemed like a whiff of fresh air. Around 50 officers informed on the Twitter Account of the IRS Association that they have prepared a report titled FORCE (Fiscal Options and Response to the Covid-19 epidemic).

The report was a personal effort on the part of the officers, who suggested a course of action for the government. The report said, “In times like these, the so-called super-rich have a higher obligation towards ensuring the larger public good.” The officers proposed that income tax rates be raised for the rich and an additional Covid Relief Cess be levied on those earning more than a specified amount. The report said that cases of non-filing of returns, not deducing tax at source, not depositing TDS in government accounts and reducing tax liability by making fake claims of losses keep on cropping up. Thus, it would be appropriate to increase tax rates from 30 to 40% for those with an annual income of more than Rs one crore and wealth tax or property tax on those whose annual income is more than Rs 5 crore. 

These officers were neither Communists nor revolutionaries seeking a fundamental change in the system. They proposed merely that some new taxes be imposed temporarily to bring the country’s economy back on the rails and to ensure that the poor and the middle classes have cash in their hands so as to give a boost to trade and commerce. 

The super-rich realized that this could be the thin end of the wedge. They were rattled and soon, stories began appearing in the media insinuating that these officers were guilty of gross indiscipline. Articles were carried arguing that such measures would infuriate the rich and promote tax evasion. The government got cracking and three senior IRS officers were penalized by shifting them from their posts. The government said that more than the young officers, it was their seniors who were responsible for this breach of discipline as they had provoked the former to prepare the report8. The officers held guilty were Prashant Bhushan, principal commissioner of income tax, Delhi; Prakash Dubey, director DOPT, Delhi and Sanjay Bahadur, principal director, investigation, northeast region.

No one praised the sensitivity of these officers and their dedication to duty. No editorial was written in their support and no TV debates were held. No one raised the question that when these officers had neither criticized the government nor imposed any new tax on their own but had only made some suggestions for consideration by the government, how were they guilty of indiscipline? If any officer had suggested imposition of higher taxes on the poor or the middle classes, would that have been considered an act of indiscipline?

They did not get any support from the media. No civil society organization came out in their support and neither did any caste or religious organization back them. Neither the Communist parties spoke in their favour nor socialists or the pro-social justice Ambedkarites. No one said that these diligent and visionary officers had realized much before the Communist parties, who talk of the proletariat at the drop of hat, and the economists, experts in making all sorts of predictions by juggling figures, that the coming months would witness an increasing concentration of wealth into a few hands.    

Be that as it may, the world of which the super-rich dream is a world in which there would be no place for questions. They want a world in which everyone has food to eat, clothes to wear and a roof over his head. But they do not want anyone to question the inequality that informs our world, due to which people are stressed all their lives and no one seems happy. They don’t want to know why some people are dying bit by bit. And why some human communities are disappearing from the face of the earth. If we want to ensure that the world of their dreams doesn’t become a reality, we should continue to ask questions, we should welcome all legitimate questions against them, no matter who raises them. As a beginning, we should try taking the questions raised by the IRS officers to the people. 

Pramod Ranjan is interested in studying the working of media organizations, philosophy of knowledge and analysis of the ignored aspects of literature, culture and society. He is an assistant professor in the Rabindranath Tagore School of Language and Culture Studies of the Assam Central University.



Contact: +91-9811884495, janvikalp@gmail.com

References 

[1] Oxfam Media Briefing, “The Hunger Virus: How Covid-19 Is Fuelling Hunger In A Hungry World,” July 9, 2020.

[2]  Shagun Kapil (2020) “COVID-19 lockdowns may be over but poor still go hungry”, Down to Earth, December 9, 2020.

[3]  Reliefweb (2021) “The Inequality Virus: Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy”, January 25, 2021.

[4] Esmé Berkhout, Nick Galasso, Max Lawson et al., “The Inequality Virus”, Oxfam, January 25, 2021.

[5] CNBC, “Taxes are likely to go up for the wealthy in these nine states”, SEP 25 2020.

[6] Washington state legislature Bill-HB 1406 – 2021-22 “Improving the equity of Washington state’s tax code by creating the Washington state wealth tax and taxing extraordinary financial intangible assets.”

[7] Americansfortaxfairness.org, “Washington Billionaires Got $151 Billion Richer Over First 10 Months of Pandemic, Their Collective Wealth Jumping Nearly One-Half”, February 2, 2021.

[8] “Finance Ministry Slams IRS Officers’ Proposal on Levying a COVID-19 Wealth Tax.” The Wire, 27 Apr. 2020.

Taken from the WSPUS website

India: turning a deaf ear to misery and despair | World Socialist Party of the US (wspus.org)

 Arconic, the company that made the Grenfell Tower cladding told a “misleading half-truth” to a British standards board, its boss has accepted. It only shared one successful fire test result with the British Board of Agrément (BBA), and not a failed result.