Honduras – An American Colony?

 Despite charges of voter fraud, Juan Orlando Hernández was elected president of Honduras in late 2013 with full support from the United States

On Feb. 15, nine years after his election and one month after he left office, Hernández was arrested on charges of drug trafficking at the request of the United States, which has also requested his extradition. Once his power was gone, Hernández, the U.S. ally, instantly became the United States’ enemy. When he served the interests of the United States, Hernández was untouchable. 

The real power in Central America is and always will be Washington. Once you no longer serve a purpose, Washington may exhibit that power. Hernández being arrested for drug trafficking by a country that consumes the most drugs in the world is riddled with hypocrisy, but it reminds Central America that the U.S. will always be in charge.

The United States effectively painted Honduras as a backward country, when it is, in fact, a victim of American intervention and condescension. Even now, as the Biden-Harris administration works to end corruption in Central America as a means to end migration, the framing is always the same. Honduras is corrupt. The U.S. is exceptional. Where was that exceptionalism during the Hernández’ administration? The U.S. knew who he was but expressed no problem with him until his arrest.

This American tradition of supporting political criminals will never go away.

Ex-Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández arrested on drug trafficking charges (msnbc.com)

Summer School



Fircroft College in Birmingham 

19th – 21st August 2022.

This year’s Summer School theme is ‘The Class Divide’.

The Class Divide

The richest 10% of people own more than 80% of global wealth, and the 10 richest men have six times more wealth than the poorest 3.1 billion people combined. These vast inequalities in wealth reflect how society is split into two classes: the capitalist class get their wealth through owning industries and corporations, and the working class rely on wages or benefits to buy what is needed.

The Socialist Party’s weekend of talks and discussion looks at why capitalism is divided into classes and how the antagonism between them impacts the way we live. What is ‘class consciousness’ and how does it develop? To what extent is it meaningful to say that there is a middle class? What classes were there before capitalism, in previous stages of history? And what could a future classless society be like?

The full residential cost (including accommodation and meals from Friday evening to Sunday afternoon) is £100; the concessionary rate is £50. 



Book online here or send a cheque (payable to the Socialist Party of Great Britain) with your contact details to Summer School, The Socialist Party, 52 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UN. 



Day visitors are welcome, but please book by e-mail in advance. 



E-mail enquiries to spgbschool@yahoo.co.uk.

Willkommenskultur (“welcome culture”)

 In 2015 and 2016, many people also had little understanding for this attitude. They did not want to take in refugees and migrants. The xenophobic protest movement gave rise to the far-right populist Alternative for Germany party (AfD).

The nonprofit Bertelsmann Foundation in its representative study “Willkommenskultur zwischen Stabilität und Aufbruch,” (Welcome Culture Between Stability and Departure) has now taken a closer look at changes in Germans’ attitudes and identified a trend: Germans are more optimistic about migration and immigration than they were a few years ago.

“In essence, our survey shows that skepticism toward immigration is still widespread in Germany, but it has continually declined in recent years,” says Ulrike Wieland, co-author of the study: “More people now see the potential benefits of migration; especially for the economy. When it comes to perceptions of integration, we find that more respondents than in previous years see inequality of opportunity and discrimination as significant obstacles hampering integration of individuals.”

Many see immigration as a way to help solve Germany’s demographic and economic problems. For example, two out of three respondents see immigration as helping to balance out an ageing society, more than half of those polled said it could also compensate for the ongoing shortage of skilled workers, and half of all respondents expect immigrants to generate additional revenue for Germany’s pension fund.

Germans have overall become more accepting of refugees. But over one-third of respondents (36%) believe that Germany cannot take in any more of them. In 2017, that number stood at 54%. Currently, 20% consider the refugees to be “temporary guests” who do not need to be integrated into society.

“We see that one-fifth of the population is skeptical of refugees or outright rejects them. These people seem to have a worldview that supports the idea of a (far-reaching) social closure against migration,” explains co-author Ulrike Wieland.

However, respondents still remain skeptical. The Bertelsmann Foundation study also clearly shows that there is still a lot of skepticism in Germany when it comes to refugees.

 67% say that immigrants place an additional burden on the welfare state, 66% say they worry about conflicts erupting between people born and raised in Germany and immigrants, and many respondents fear that schools are facing major problems integrating immigrant students.

Skilled immigrants seeking employment or academic opportunities are more accepted (71%) than refugees who are primarily seeking protection (59 %).

Aid worker Christian Osterhaus looks back at when he started working with refugees: “At the time, I really had the impression that German society had opened up and changed and had actually learned a lot.” He believes that interpersonal connections and friendships are the foundation for the path to building a real welcome culture in Germany. Osterhaus was one of hundreds of thousands of people in Germany who set out to help those fleeing civil war in Syria and other countries, and to help integrate them into German society. “We wanted to give these people a new home,” Osterhaus says looking back.

Germans less skeptical of immigration | Germany | News and in-depth reporting from Berlin and beyond | DW | 16.02.2022

Socialist Sonnet No. 54

 The Eagle and the Bear

 

 Again, the bear growls and the eagle flaps,

Claws and talons brandished, bristling with pride,

Each self-righteous, claiming the other lied,

Another squabble over lines on maps

Drawn and redrawn at the beck of capital.

Markets tremble, armies muster and march,

While those with only their labour to sell

Are, too often, employed in martial hell,

Not heeding lessons history has to teach.

How many stones need to be cut and dressed,

Assembled into cenotaphs, then incised

With gilded names of the slaughtered? How prized

Is rhetoric when profits are assessed?

Whichever country victory chooses,

The world entire, and its future, loses.


D. A.

 

Quote of the Day

 “Bill Clinton sought to lead from the “center,” but by then the “center” had moved so far right that Clinton gutted public assistance, enacted “tough on crime” policies that unjustly burdened the poor and people of color, and deregulated Wall Street. All of which put me further to the left of the center—although my political views had barely changed.” – Robert Reich, served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration

Quote of the Day

 “Bill Clinton sought to lead from the “center,” but by then the “center” had moved so far right that Clinton gutted public assistance, enacted “tough on crime” policies that unjustly burdened the poor and people of color, and deregulated Wall Street. All of which put me further to the left of the center—although my political views had barely changed.” – Robert Reich, served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration

Climate Change and Political Crises

 Climate change is both “risk” and “threat multipliers”. The Bay of Bengal coast, home to a quarter of the world’s population, is a perfect example of the fight over fast-disappearing land. Disastrous floods, deadly heatwaves and devastating cyclones are taking a heavy toll in the Bay of Bengal region, which covers more than 2 million sq km (772,204 sq miles.) Rising sea levels, in particular, could result in land and infrastructure loss in the future, besides altering the location and allocation of strategic military assets, researchers said.

Military and civil conflicts could intensify along the Bay of Bengal coastline, fuelled by climate change-linked migration, land loss and displacement, researchers a report, by think-tanks the Netherlands-based Clingendael Institute and India’s Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, said.  The area is seeing frequent extreme weather, which combined with its strategic, social and economic fault-lines, makes it “fertile ground” for social friction and violence, they warned

The region was already dotted with conflicts over resources, identity and growing migration flows. The report pointed to conflicts between social groups, communities and the state over control of valuable but shrinking natural resources like land, forests, water and minerals. It also pointed to a dozen ethnic separatist movements triggered by conflict over resources in Northeast India.

“Climate change can widen socio-economic divides that in some cases can snowball into political instability and widen conflicts,” said Angshuman Choudhury, one of the report authors. “Migration is a key link in this chain of consequences… The so-called ‘insider versus outsider’ conflicts are increasing,” he said, referring to tensions between those on the move and their host communities.”

Pointing to porous international borders cutting across countries that are home to socio-culturally similar groups, the report flagged growing conflicts triggered by migration, identifying “climate-induced” movement as a key driver. In India, anti-immigrant violence in northeast Assam state has been triggered by people moving across the India-Bangladesh border, while Bangladesh has seen local protests against Rohingya refugees from Myanmar.

Climate pressures could also aggravate land depletion, dispossession and degradation, fuelling economic and social insecurity among agrarian communities and ethnic minorities, leading to new phases of violent conflict, the report added.

“Climate change increases the risk of various types of violence and human insecurity,” said Florian Krampe, director of the climate change and risk programme at SIPRI, a Swedish institute dedicated to research into conflict and disarmament.

Climate migration worsens conflicts in Bay of Bengal region (trust.org)

Bernie Rails Against the Oligarchy

 The blog may hold its own deep differences with Bernie Sanders but we do acknowledge his useful role in that he does occasionally brings to the US public some uncomfortable home truths.

He did so in a recent Senate speech. 

“While the vast majority of people in our country are hurting emotionally, they’re hurting economically, these are not difficult times for everybody,” he explained. “If you are a billionaire in this country or a CEO of a large corporation… these times have not been bad; they have, in fact, have been very, very good.”

As people nationwide worry about “soaring” gas prices, fossil fuel giants “are making huge profits,” Sanders said, also noting it was the same in the food industry.

The senator pointed out that chief executives now make about 350 times more than the average U.S. worker.

“The top one per cent owns more wealth than the bottom 92 per cent. Rather amazingly, two of the wealthiest people in America now own more wealth than the bottom 42 per cent,” the Senate Budget Committee chair said.

“When we speak about oligarchy, we should all understand that we’re not just talking about massive levels of income and wealth inequality,” Sanders emphasized. “We should all understand that never before in American history have so few owned so much.”

“And this issue—the issue of the incredible concentration of ownership in our country—is almost never talked about here in Congress or in the corporate media,” he continued, “and that has a lot to do with the corrupt political system that we operate under, where many members of Congress receive huge campaign contributions from these very same people.”

Sanders took aim at three Wall Street firms, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. 

They collectively manage over $21 trillion in assets, or more than the gross domestic product of the United States, the world’s largest economy.

These three firms, Sanders explained, “are major shareholders in more than 96% of S&P 500 companies.” They “are the largest shareholders in some of the biggest banks in America” and “are among the top owners of the four major airlines.” BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street also “own an average of 20% of the major drug companies,” 

He also said that a handful of firms “are now the major owners of rental housing” and ” control half of the newspapers” in the country.

He compared the conditions of ordinary American workers.

“The reality is that tens of millions of working-class people, lower-income people, in the wealthiest country on Earth, are suffering today under incredible economic hardship, desperately trying day to day to survive.”

While “half of the people in our country are living paycheck to paycheck and tens of millions of our people are an accident, a divorce, an illness, or a layoff away from economic devastation,” Sanders noted, “over 80 million Americas are uninsured or under-insured and tens of thousands die each and every year because they don’t get to a doctor when they should.”

“Many public schools throughout our country lack the resources to adequately educate our young people, or pay their teachers the wages those teachers deserve; at the same time we are the most heavily incarcerated nation on Earth,” he added. “Meanwhile, 45 million Americans who did go to college… are now drowning in $1.8 trillion in student debt.”

“[Americans]work long hours for low wages. They worry about their kids. They can’t afford healthcare. They see their jobs going to other countries.”

Polls show they are “giving up on democracy.” Faced with such conditions, Sanders said, voters are frustrated with elected officials and wondering: “Do they live in the real world? Do they understand what is going on in our lives or are they too busy going out raising campaign contributions from the rich and the powerful?”

“Maybe the time is approaching that we should offer a unanimous resolution congratulating the billionaire class for their enormous success in moving this country into the oligarchic form of society that they have long desired,” Sanders said.

The Bankers Bonuses

 



British bankers will start collecting the biggest bonuses since before the 2008 global financial crisis.

As most Britons face the biggest squeeze on their incomes since at least 1990, already very highly paid bankers are celebrating “particularly obscene” bonuses.

London’s mergers and acquisitions (M&A) bankers earned total fees of $3.5bn (£2.6bn) in 2021.

London’s big four banks – HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest – are expected to pay out bonuses totalling more than £4bn when they report their annual results in the next fortnight. 

Combined, the banks’ annual profits are expected to exceed £34bn – the most since 2007 in the boom before the financial crisis. 

The bumper bonuses will tip several hundred more UK bankers into the EU’s “high earners” warning report which details every banker earning more than €1m (£835,000) a year. The European Banking Authority (EBA) found that 3,519 bankers working in the UK earned more than €1m-a-year last year – more than seven times as many as those working in Germany which has the second-highest number of €1m-a-year bankers.

The EBA figures show 27 UK bankers earned more than €10m in 2019 (the latest year available). Two UK-based asset managers were paid between €38m and €39m, and one merchant banker was paid €64.8m. That banker received fixed pay of €242,000, topped up with a bonus of €64.6m.

Figures released on Tuesday by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that average pay in the public sector rose by 2.6% between October and December 2021, while those working in business and finance saw their pay grow by 8.1% due to “an increase in bonus payments”.

Gary Smith, general secretary of the GMB union, which represents 600,000 mostly frontline workers, said: “These sky-high banker bonuses are a kick in the teeth for everyone suffering with the cost of living crisis. I hope Andrew Bailey tells his banking mates to show the same ‘restraint’ he so readily demands from underpaid workers in the rest of the economy. Essential workers, like our nation’s carers, often earn pennies above the minimum wage,” Smith said. “Mr Bailey should step out of his banking bubble and shadow these workers to see the people who actually deserve a proper pay rise.”

Frances O’Grady, the general secretary of trade union body the TUC, said the huge increase in bankers’ pay was “an insult to working families across Britain”.

“While millions struggle with the cost of living, executive bankers are set to receive yet another cash windfall,” she said. “At a time when workers are being told not to ask for a decent pay rise, no such restraint is being asked of the City. We should be holding down bonuses, not ordinary people’s wages.”

Luke Hildyard, the director of the High Pay Centre, which campaigns for executive pay restraint, said: “Decades of economic deference to the super rich have brought us to a point where bankers are raking in historic pay awards while the rest of the country is crippled by rising prices and wage stagnation…”

‘We’ve had a run on champagne:’ Biggest UK banker bonuses since financial crash | Executive pay and bonuses | The Guardian

Korean Golden Spoons

 Derived from the English expression that refers to those born into privilege “with a silver spoon in their mouth”, a geumsujeo , a “gold spoon” is someone from the top 1% of high-income households in South Korea. It’s often used to refer to the children of super-rich families. 

The term “dirt spoons” represents the other end of the spectrum.

Films and TV dramas like Parasite and Squid Game have highlighted the “gold spoon-dirt spoon” divide.

Korean millennials, like their peers in many developed countries, are bearing the brunt of increasing class inequality.

These days, it’s near impossible for a young Korean to buy a home on an average company salary.



A growing number no longer trust that hard work will deliver dues; many instead believe that success in life depends on the family you’re born into.

Education is also no longer the great social leveller, when some 70% of school-leavers go on to university. People’s faith in the university system has also been tarnished by nepotism scandals.

“We’re now at the point where some people genuinely believe that Korea does not offer social mobility,” Se-Woong Koo, the editor of Korean Exposé, a  newsletter focusing on contemporary Korea, said.

“The only way to be well-off is to have rich parents or to marry money. And as a result, many people aspire to belong to that ‘gold spoon’ generation who appear to have it so easy.”


Single’s Inferno: Why ‘fake’ rich girl Song Ji-a enraged South Korea – BBC News