Peace in our time?

 

Victory in Europe, the end of the Second World War is remembered in the West on 8 May. In Russia, and former Soviet states, Victory Day is remembered on 9 May. The present conflict between Ukraine and Russia has had the President of Ukraine implying that in war, Russia designates the conflict as a Special Military Operation, anything goes and he has openly threatened to attack the Victory day ‘celebrations’ taking place in Moscow.

Politicians and ‘leaders’ who, in May of 1945 or thereafter, may have channelled the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, who returned from a meeting with Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor, after signing the Munich Agreement, waving a piece of paper and proclaiming peace in our time! Would have been either naïve, disingenuous or lacking in understanding in understanding of capitalism and its determination to seek competitive advantage and the increase of power and profits through any means possible. As the American General Smedley D. Butler wrote, War is a racket!

We now have an additional conflict added to the ones now currently taking place. To Ukraine-Russia, USA-Yemen, USA-Iran (possible future one), Israel -various Middle East states, Pakistan and India, both nuclear states, have just engaged in escalating tensions.

A search of Wiki shows that major conflicts between these two states took place in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, 1999 and now 2025. There have been many minor skirmishes along the way.

Since 1945 there have been many other serious or minor conflicts taking place all across the world. ‘Peace’ and ‘capitalism’ put together is an oxymoron. Who seriously believes that real peace will ever descend upon the world whilst the exploitative profit chasing capitalist system continues to exist?

The below is from the Socialist Standard May 1985.

‘VE Day in Britain was a typically bright and sunny late spring day, cloaked in a certain air of unreality. It had been obvious for several weeks that Germany was collapsing and that the war in Europe was drawing to a close. Hitler was dead and it was just a matter of time before the end. Over the radio came a stream of announcements in German, accompanied by martial music, that were later revealed to be false messages put out to spread confusion in a Germany that was sinking into chaos. In fact the choice of day was bungled. It had been intended to announce the final surrender on 9 May—the day the surrender was to be ratified at a stage-managed ceremony in Berlin—but the news was leaked by an American reporter and so the Western powers celebrated a day earlier. 

People went through a repeat performance of 1918. Church bells were rung, floodlights were turned on, there was dancing in the streets and street parties, and the usual crowds outside Buckingham Palace. The mood was more realistic than in 1918. Just as in September 1939 there had been an absence of the hysteria of 1914, so in 1945 there were no wild expectations. People had at least learned enough to realise that this was not going to be a World Fit for Heroes and there was a complete absence of the Hang the Kaiser type of nonsense, the overwhelming feelings were of relief and concern about what lay ahead. After all, the first World War had only ended 27 years before, so people in early middle life could clearly remember what had followed it: a brief period of full employment and a slump that lasted, with fluctuations, until 1939. During all that time there were never less than a million unemployed, which served to keep down workers’ wages, and even those who were children in the 1920s had vivid memories of the heroes of yesterday, often minus limbs, singing and playing for money in the streets. In 1945 prophesies were rife that there would be a couple of million unemployed, and war with Japan still had some time to run. 

Wartime censorship was still in operation and decisions which were to shape future events hidden from the public. People who had grown up with the concept of an “Empire on which the sun never sets” had no idea that in not much more than a generation only a few distant outposts would remain. And while Hamburg and Dresden were in the past, the dropping of the atom bomb was still to come: an event that would make total annihilation a possibility. But perhaps the most important unknown fact was the deterioration of the relationship with Russia. 

This latter was to present the authorities with one of their most difficult problems that of convincing people that those gallant, smiling heroic soldiers were in fact a menace to be feared. But they had had practice in such things in 1941, when they had to undo the propaganda efforts of the previous two years. From the signing of the Non-Aggression ‘Pact with Germany just before the outbreak of war, through the invasion of eastern Poland and the attack on Finland, the Soviet Union was portrayed as a tyranny. The British Communist Party opposed the war and the Daily Worker was suppressed. When, in June 1941, the Germans invaded Russia, a complete change around took place. The propaganda machine was turned on full blast and for four years everything Russian became not only fashionable, but admirable. Russian faces looked down from hoardings and out from our news papers and magazines, Russian tunes poured from the radio, with dance-band singers trying to sound like Cossacks. while Russian films drew long queues to the box office. Russia was portrayed as a kind of democracy, different from the West but still a democracy. Joseph Stalin was really a kindly old chap who smoked a pipe and had a sense of humour. The purges and show trials were portrayed as being aimed solely at Nazi Fifth Columnists. The Daily Worker was restored and used the same strip cartoons that had opposed the war to support it. 

But on VE Day the public were blissfully unaware of this and Russian flags were carried with the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes. The media—newspapers and magazines, radio and films—consciously sought to create a feeling that the war had blown away much that was stuffy and stale and that we were about to emerge into an exciting new world. This had started quite abruptly at the end of 1940 after the collapse of France and the beginning of the Blitz. With no introduction or build-up, just as if they had turned on a tap, the authorities started to talk about a new world. This was not the crude old stuff of the 1914-18 war, but much more subtle. Committees were set up and reports were issued covering every aspect of the economy. The most famous was the Beveridge Plan which, even from a capitalist point of view, hardly merited the claim to be “the hope of salvation for the future of the people of this country”. However the propaganda machine pushed it until it became part of modern folklore. Planning Boards were set up for the development of town and country and to prevent the ugliness of pre-war urban sprawl. The bombing had laid bare large areas of the City of London and grandiose schemes were drawn up to lay these out with wide boulevards and open up a vista of St. Paul’s from the Thames, with gardens and walks. But capitalism does not allow some of the most expensive land in the world to become flowerbeds. The result can be seen today in the City’s forest of gigantic office blocks. 

Alongside this, throughout the war, every effort was made to encourage discussion and education as a morale booster, and to allay the boredom of the troops who during the build-up to D Day had been kept in comparative inaction. Radio programmes like the Brains Trust and the lunch-time concerts in an empty National Gallery were part of this, as was the effort of the Army Bureau of Current Affairs, who sent out fortnightly pamphlets to Army units for discussion. One result of this was to produce a swing to the Left in political thinking, which helped to produce the Labour victory at the 1945 General Election. 

During the war a political truce had prevailed and government was by coalition, on VE Day the truce was still intact but behind the scenes it was breaking up. Party leaders began to make veiled political speeches and after VE Day a General Election was called. This took place on 5 July but the count was delayed until 25 July to allow time for postal votes from the Armed Forces to come in. It was a quiet affair conducted on an out-of-date register and it resulted in a sweeping Labour victory. This was greeted by exaggerated hopes and fears. The Left saw it as the beginning of socialism which would sweep away the problems of the world, while some of the sillier Tories feared that they would be dispossessed, or at least lose their savings. Neither fears nor hopes were justified as all the Labour government could do was to run the country in the interest of the British capitalist class. Not that they had the slightest intention of doing anything else.

The Conservative Party were badly shaken by their defeat. For twenty years they had had things their own way; they had undoubtedly lost touch with grassroots feelings and their organisation had become obsolete. After a period of sulking because the electorate had had the cheek to throw them out, they began a steady climb back. They did what they would have shunned before the war and went out on to the streets. We were treated to the sight of top Tories slumming and ex-Cabinet Ministers were prepared to debate with anybody. They even found a few Tory working men who could be relied on to drop their aitches at the right place and address Tory women delegates in flowered hats as “mate”. They went over big with the well-heeled delegates at the annual conference. Once they began to pick up again, the Tories dropped all this kind of stuff.

The Labour government began with a massive programme of nationalisation, which they called socialism, and found it difficult to get the British economy going again after the war. They gradually became more and more unpopular. Fascism had been discredited during the war but was soon to rear its ugly head again. 

There is no doubt that many men coming back from active service were determined that their children should grow up in a better world and that what they saw as the errors of the past should not be repeated. Unfortunately it was the inevitable workings of capitalism with which they were dealing. Slowly this political interest faded and for some years, once the immediate post war shortages had eased. things on the surface appeared much improved. Mass unemployment did not appear for many years and during the “never had it so good” era many people thought that the world had learned how to deal with such things as slumps. There were other problems of capitalism, principally the chronic housing shortage. People had jobs but nowhere decent to live. Love on the Dole was replaced by Cathy Come Home—and In Which We Serve by The War Game.’

Les Dale

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2015/07/they-called-it-peace-1985.html


Peace in our time?

 

Victory in Europe, the end of the Second World War is remembered in the West on 8 May. In Russia, and former Soviet states, Victory Day is remembered on 9 May. The present conflict between Ukraine and Russia has had the President of Ukraine implying that in war, Russia designates the conflict as a Special Military Operation, anything goes and he has openly threatened to attack the Victory day ‘celebrations’ taking place in Moscow.

Politicians and ‘leaders’ who, in May of 1945 or thereafter, may have channelled the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, who returned from a meeting with Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor, after signing the Munich Agreement, waving a piece of paper and proclaiming peace in our time! Would have been either naïve, disingenuous or lacking in understanding in understanding of capitalism and its determination to seek competitive advantage and the increase of power and profits through any means possible. As the American General Smedley D. Butler wrote, War is a racket!

We now have an additional conflict added to the ones now currently taking place. To Ukraine-Russia, USA-Yemen, USA-Iran (possible future one), Israel -various Middle East states, Pakistan and India, both nuclear states, have just engaged in escalating tensions.

A search of Wiki shows that major conflicts between these two states took place in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, 1999 and now 2025. There have been many minor skirmishes along the way.

Since 1945 there have been many other serious or minor conflicts taking place all across the world. ‘Peace’ and ‘capitalism’ put together is an oxymoron. Who seriously believes that real peace will ever descend upon the world whilst the exploitative profit chasing capitalist system continues to exist?

The below is from the Socialist Standard May 1985.

‘VE Day in Britain was a typically bright and sunny late spring day, cloaked in a certain air of unreality. It had been obvious for several weeks that Germany was collapsing and that the war in Europe was drawing to a close. Hitler was dead and it was just a matter of time before the end. Over the radio came a stream of announcements in German, accompanied by martial music, that were later revealed to be false messages put out to spread confusion in a Germany that was sinking into chaos. In fact the choice of day was bungled. It had been intended to announce the final surrender on 9 May—the day the surrender was to be ratified at a stage-managed ceremony in Berlin—but the news was leaked by an American reporter and so the Western powers celebrated a day earlier. 

People went through a repeat performance of 1918. Church bells were rung, floodlights were turned on, there was dancing in the streets and street parties, and the usual crowds outside Buckingham Palace. The mood was more realistic than in 1918. Just as in September 1939 there had been an absence of the hysteria of 1914, so in 1945 there were no wild expectations. People had at least learned enough to realise that this was not going to be a World Fit for Heroes and there was a complete absence of the Hang the Kaiser type of nonsense, the overwhelming feelings were of relief and concern about what lay ahead. After all, the first World War had only ended 27 years before, so people in early middle life could clearly remember what had followed it: a brief period of full employment and a slump that lasted, with fluctuations, until 1939. During all that time there were never less than a million unemployed, which served to keep down workers’ wages, and even those who were children in the 1920s had vivid memories of the heroes of yesterday, often minus limbs, singing and playing for money in the streets. In 1945 prophesies were rife that there would be a couple of million unemployed, and war with Japan still had some time to run. 

Wartime censorship was still in operation and decisions which were to shape future events hidden from the public. People who had grown up with the concept of an “Empire on which the sun never sets” had no idea that in not much more than a generation only a few distant outposts would remain. And while Hamburg and Dresden were in the past, the dropping of the atom bomb was still to come: an event that would make total annihilation a possibility. But perhaps the most important unknown fact was the deterioration of the relationship with Russia. 

This latter was to present the authorities with one of their most difficult problems that of convincing people that those gallant, smiling heroic soldiers were in fact a menace to be feared. But they had had practice in such things in 1941, when they had to undo the propaganda efforts of the previous two years. From the signing of the Non-Aggression ‘Pact with Germany just before the outbreak of war, through the invasion of eastern Poland and the attack on Finland, the Soviet Union was portrayed as a tyranny. The British Communist Party opposed the war and the Daily Worker was suppressed. When, in June 1941, the Germans invaded Russia, a complete change around took place. The propaganda machine was turned on full blast and for four years everything Russian became not only fashionable, but admirable. Russian faces looked down from hoardings and out from our news papers and magazines, Russian tunes poured from the radio, with dance-band singers trying to sound like Cossacks. while Russian films drew long queues to the box office. Russia was portrayed as a kind of democracy, different from the West but still a democracy. Joseph Stalin was really a kindly old chap who smoked a pipe and had a sense of humour. The purges and show trials were portrayed as being aimed solely at Nazi Fifth Columnists. The Daily Worker was restored and used the same strip cartoons that had opposed the war to support it. 

But on VE Day the public were blissfully unaware of this and Russian flags were carried with the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes. The media—newspapers and magazines, radio and films—consciously sought to create a feeling that the war had blown away much that was stuffy and stale and that we were about to emerge into an exciting new world. This had started quite abruptly at the end of 1940 after the collapse of France and the beginning of the Blitz. With no introduction or build-up, just as if they had turned on a tap, the authorities started to talk about a new world. This was not the crude old stuff of the 1914-18 war, but much more subtle. Committees were set up and reports were issued covering every aspect of the economy. The most famous was the Beveridge Plan which, even from a capitalist point of view, hardly merited the claim to be “the hope of salvation for the future of the people of this country”. However the propaganda machine pushed it until it became part of modern folklore. Planning Boards were set up for the development of town and country and to prevent the ugliness of pre-war urban sprawl. The bombing had laid bare large areas of the City of London and grandiose schemes were drawn up to lay these out with wide boulevards and open up a vista of St. Paul’s from the Thames, with gardens and walks. But capitalism does not allow some of the most expensive land in the world to become flowerbeds. The result can be seen today in the City’s forest of gigantic office blocks. 

Alongside this, throughout the war, every effort was made to encourage discussion and education as a morale booster, and to allay the boredom of the troops who during the build-up to D Day had been kept in comparative inaction. Radio programmes like the Brains Trust and the lunch-time concerts in an empty National Gallery were part of this, as was the effort of the Army Bureau of Current Affairs, who sent out fortnightly pamphlets to Army units for discussion. One result of this was to produce a swing to the Left in political thinking, which helped to produce the Labour victory at the 1945 General Election. 

During the war a political truce had prevailed and government was by coalition, on VE Day the truce was still intact but behind the scenes it was breaking up. Party leaders began to make veiled political speeches and after VE Day a General Election was called. This took place on 5 July but the count was delayed until 25 July to allow time for postal votes from the Armed Forces to come in. It was a quiet affair conducted on an out-of-date register and it resulted in a sweeping Labour victory. This was greeted by exaggerated hopes and fears. The Left saw it as the beginning of socialism which would sweep away the problems of the world, while some of the sillier Tories feared that they would be dispossessed, or at least lose their savings. Neither fears nor hopes were justified as all the Labour government could do was to run the country in the interest of the British capitalist class. Not that they had the slightest intention of doing anything else.

The Conservative Party were badly shaken by their defeat. For twenty years they had had things their own way; they had undoubtedly lost touch with grassroots feelings and their organisation had become obsolete. After a period of sulking because the electorate had had the cheek to throw them out, they began a steady climb back. They did what they would have shunned before the war and went out on to the streets. We were treated to the sight of top Tories slumming and ex-Cabinet Ministers were prepared to debate with anybody. They even found a few Tory working men who could be relied on to drop their aitches at the right place and address Tory women delegates in flowered hats as “mate”. They went over big with the well-heeled delegates at the annual conference. Once they began to pick up again, the Tories dropped all this kind of stuff.

The Labour government began with a massive programme of nationalisation, which they called socialism, and found it difficult to get the British economy going again after the war. They gradually became more and more unpopular. Fascism had been discredited during the war but was soon to rear its ugly head again. 

There is no doubt that many men coming back from active service were determined that their children should grow up in a better world and that what they saw as the errors of the past should not be repeated. Unfortunately it was the inevitable workings of capitalism with which they were dealing. Slowly this political interest faded and for some years, once the immediate post war shortages had eased. things on the surface appeared much improved. Mass unemployment did not appear for many years and during the “never had it so good” era many people thought that the world had learned how to deal with such things as slumps. There were other problems of capitalism, principally the chronic housing shortage. People had jobs but nowhere decent to live. Love on the Dole was replaced by Cathy Come Home—and In Which We Serve by The War Game.’

Les Dale

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2015/07/they-called-it-peace-1985.html


Socialist Sonnet No. 192

Reform

 

The ballot box hold such great potential

To become the means of a real solution,

A decisive, conscious revolution

That has no need to invoke the martial.

The commonweal is ill-served by violence,

Which just spawns reaction and bitterness.

But, for votes to count, voters must address

Themselves collectively to an immense

Change in their political perspective.

No more tinkering reforms, or leaders

Of the left, right or centre, no breeders

Of false hopes: simply, do not self-deceive.

New parties arise and governments fall,

Yet, the day after, nothing’s changed at all.

 

D. A.

Canadian Socialists election view

 


The Socialist Party of Canada has forwarded the following report to the SPGB regarding the Canadian general election which took place at the end of April 2025.

The Liberals under Mark Carney won 169 seats at the federal election on April 28. This was 3 seats short of the majority they needed; the Progressive Conservatives winning 144. The N.D.P. won 7, the Bloc Québécois 22 and the Greens won one. Most people thought it would be a tight race, which it was. Both Pierre Poilievre and Jagmeet Singh lost their seats, which must’ve been humiliating. In Poilievre’s case it may well have been his smart-ass personality and his constant personal attacks on his opponents which done-him-in. With Singh, whose party lost 7 seats, it was probably because so many would-be N.D.P. voters voted Liberal, not wanting to split its vote, thinking Carney would do a better job of standing up to Trump than Poilievre, which was the main election issue.

The Toronto Star endorsed the P.C.’s in the election on April 28. Its main points were, Canadian’s should support a government that is for free enterprise, Eliminates barriers, meaning cutting red tape, Restores fiscal discipline, reform the tax system and develop our natural resources and “That is why we are supporting Pierre Poilivere and the Conservative Party of Canada”. Since its founding in 1892, the Star’s main mantra has been to this effect, “Hey listen up folks, capitalism isn’t the economic piece of junk Marxists would have you think it is. No Siree, it’ll work just fine if you smooth away its rough edges”. You might think that with their crusading and reforming zeal they would support an openly reformist party like the N.D.P. or its predecessor the C.C.F., but they went for a blatantly “Screw the working-class party”.

Of all the provincial Premiers, Alberta’s Danielle Smith seems the likeliest to make a deal with Trump. This is probably because Alberta does a lot of business with the states selling oil and energy. Smith has given Carney a list of energy related demands which includes scrapping a federal tax on oil and gas emissions, eliminating an electrical vehicle mandate and ending prohibitions on single-use plastics. That sounds tough, but some of those issues apply to other provinces.

Carney now has to form a coalition of sorts to get legislation through. Besides taking on Trump’s junk, Carney will have to deal with a possible postal strike, a health system in near chaos, a political wild card in Alberta, Ms.Smith, an upcoming G7 in that province, crime which is out of control, housing problems galore including homelessness and a soaring cost-of-living, especially grocery prices; like, “Good Luck, Mate”.

For the working class in Canada, life would be slightly better if Canada did not become state 51, but nevertheless exploitation is exploitation and whether one is exploited as an American or a Canadian it sucks and not a one of the recently elected M.P.’s will take a stand against it.’


Karl Marx 5 May 1818

 

Karl Marx born on 5th of May, 1818





Repost from SOYMB 5 May 2016

‘To dismiss the ideas of Marx on the grounds that it has been tried and failed is to misunderstand the revolutionary message of Marx. We can safely conclude that the world has not yet seen a Marxist revolution.

Marxism is not a dogma, not a record of the sayings and doings of Karl Marx to be carefully preserved and uncritically applied whatever the circumstances. Marxism is a method of assessing what, at any particular time, is in the best interest of the working class and should be done to hasten the establishment of socialism. The validity of Marx’s theories is independent of Marx the man. Nonetheless, criticisms of Marx have been made because of the misinterpretations and distortions of Marxism that have occurred. We can safely conclude that the world has not yet seen a Marxist revolution.

The Marxian analysis of society and its development – historical, economic, political – will not die, nor go away, nor even lie down. Today, the interest in the ideas of Karl Marx is wider than ever. Marx provided a consistent, comprehensive and applicable picture of the origins and development of capitalism and of how it must be replaced by Socialism. The Socialist Party of Great Britain is a Marxist party in the sense that we accept the basis of Marx’s theories – the Materialist Conception of History, the Labour Theory of Value and the political theory of the Class Struggle.

For Marx, history is a process in which humans actively create their own conditions, doing so, at all times, within the limitations which existing economic conditions make possible. History is not given to us, like a mystery gift from above, but is made by us. History is not simply a story of the past, but a vision of the future. All historians before Marx — and too many since — believed that humans were the subjects of history, often going under the alias of God or The Invisible Hand of the Market: Marx recognised that humanity would only be liberated when it used its ability to comprehend and design history. The revolutionary point in Marxism is its proposition that mass human consciousness (our ability to think, plan and fashion our own behaviour) can transform society.

Karl Marx wrote a great deal, on a wide variety of subjects and over a long period of time.  Some of his writing was in response to political issues of the day which are long forgotten, some were concerned to criticise opponents who held views now rarely encountered while some were of a very abstract and philosophical nature.  Marx’s writings cannot be simply divided into those on economics, those on history and those on politics, for these subjects, were for Marx closely interrelated. The Socialist Party has published much on Marxism and is a party in the classical Marxian tradition. We use his ideas as tools of analysis, which have been further developed and modified by socialists, to explain how the working class are exploited under capitalism and how world socialism will be the emancipation of our class.

The Socialist Party has further developed Marx’s theories and has made plain where it disagrees with Marx. We do not endorse Marx’s ideas regarding struggles for national liberation, minimum reform programmes, labour vouchers and the lower stage of communism. On some of these points, the Socialist Party does not reject what Marx advocated in his own day but rejects their applicability to socialists now. There are other issues upon which the Socialist Party might appear to be at variance with Marx, but is in fact only disputing distortions of Marx’s thinking. For example, the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ is usually understood in its Leninist interpretation. Indeed, it is a tragedy of world-historical proportions that Marx has been Leninised; what is basically a method of social analysis with a view to taking informed political action by the working class, has had its name put to a state ideology of repression of the working class. Instead of being known as a tool for working class self-emancipation, we have had the abomination of ‘Marxist states’.

Undeterred by these developments, the Socialist Party has made its own contributions to socialist theory whilst combating distortions of Marx’s ideas. In the light of all the above, the three main Marxist theories can be restated as:

1. The political theory of class struggle

2. The materialist theory of history

3. The labour theory of value

Marxism is not only a method for criticising capitalism; it also points to the alternative. Marxism explains the importance to the working class of common ownership, democratic control and production solely for use and the means for establishing it. And while it is desirable that socialist activists should acquaint themselves with the basics of Marxism, it is absolutely essential that a majority of workers have a working knowledge of how capitalism operates and what the change to socialism will mean.’

https://soymb.com/2016/05/happy-birthday-charlie.html


Free speech?

 

Historically free speech must be viewed in the context of confrontation and compromise. The suppression of free speech has always been used by the dominant value system as a political weapon against the working class, i.e. the alienation of the proletariat as a means of disenfranchising the proletariat. However, there came a time when, due to the pressures of democracy free speech was more permitted by the ruling elite. Better to allow the pressure cooker to let of steam rather than explode and cause damage to the existing order.

The first amendment of the American constitution specifically bans the abridgement of freedom of speech or of the press.

Sedition is defined as ‘Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state’.

‘The United States has had two sedition acts: the Sedition Act of 1798 and the Sedition Act of 1918.

The Sedition Act of 1798 was part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were enacted by the 5th United States Congress. This act criminalized false and malicious statements about the federal government, aiming to restrict freedom of speech under national security grounds. It expired in 1800.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was an amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917, extending the scope of offences to include speech and opinions that cast the government or the war effort in a negative light. It applied only during times when the United States was at war and was repealed on December 13, 1920.’

Within the UK The Sedition Act 1661  ‘aimed at suppressing criticism of the King and maintaining governmental authority. Passed shortly after the Restoration of Charles II, it imposed penalties on anyone who wrote, printed, or preached words against the King, reflecting the monarch’s efforts to consolidate power and control over the press and public discourse.

This act was later amended and its provisions were incorporated into other laws, such as the Treason Act 1695 and the Treason Felony Act 1848. The Sedition Act 1661 was repealed on 21 July 1967 by the Criminal Law Act 1667, but some of its key provisions, particularly those related to treason, continue to influence modern UK law.’ Internet.

In 2009, the UK government abolished the offences of seditious libel and criminal defamation, marking a significant shift towards protecting freedom of speech’.

The establishment has little or no sense of humour and when it feels that satire and mockery have gone too far it will take steps to punish its lampooners. American entertainers and stand-up comics Bill Hicks and Lenny Bruce are two examples of state suppression. Bruce was arrested for obscenity in his act and Bill Hicks was censored. Hicks gig on the David Letterman Show in 1993 was completely cut and not aired. As to what effect their use and promotion of recreational drugs was a factor is debatable.

The anarchic punk band The Sex Pistols had their recording ‘God Save the Queen’ banned by the BBC and nearly all the radio stations in 1976 presumably for upsetting the monarchy in Jubilee year. They were also refused visas to enter the United States, but that ban was later lifted. There were many musicians banned from entering the USA for one reason or another.

Under the guise of protecting workers from harassment the current Labour Government is trying to implement legal sanctions against conversations between drinkers in pubs.

Under Ms Rayner’s new rules, pubs will need to protect its staff from harassment from “third parties”, such as drinking punters. Landlords fear they could be sued if someone takes offence to “overheard conversations” among patrons. Brian Whiting, the chief executive of WH Pubs, said: “We are very good at controlling our customers but I can’t control what they say.”’.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2003013/angela-rayner-pub-owner-tax-hikes-national-insurance

Offence can only be taken, not given.

The capitalist system using various means to defend the status quo. Socialists will always highlight the charade of a system that props up the greed and avarice of free-market entrepreneurs who use ‘free speech’ as a marketing device for the furtherance of the capitalist agenda.

Free speech is fundamental to the advocacy of socialism. Socialists use free speech as a defence against exploitation, not as a weapon of anger, bigotry and racism and to prevent further the cause of capital exploitation.

Barry Watts





Socialist Sonnet No. 191

May Day

 

This feast day of Joseph the Artisan,

Liberated for Labor from the Church

When congregations of workers began

Gathering to confront the capital rich.

An infamous Haymarket bomb, a hail

Of police bullets, then the hangman’s rope

Demonstrated reasoned reforms would fail:

Workers must make and pursue their own hope.

Now, fourteen decades after the event,

Collective hopes remain unrealised,

So many parties, despite their intent,

Have left capital’s spirit unexorcised.

Yet potential power is marked by May Day,

Of workers turning history their way.

 

D.A.

May Day

 

Reprinted from SOYMB 1 May 2016


“Arise ye prisoners of starvation, Arise ye wretched of the earth.”



May Day inspires fear in the hearts of the capitalists and hope in the workers the world over. Why do they fear the worker’s holiday? What are they afraid of? May Days have come and gone yet each and every year they are a sign of what rulers’ fear: the fear of general strikes, of political revolt, of workers’ uprisings, of the militancy of workers. 

 Eugene V. Debs wrote: “This is the first and only International Labor Day. It belongs to the working class and is dedicated to the Revolution.”  

Our May Day is actually the only holiday celebrated internationally. It obliterates all differences of race, creed, colour, and nationality. It celebrates the brotherhood of all workers everywhere. It crosses all national boundaries, it transcends all language barriers, it ignores all religious differences. It makes clear the difference between all workers and all employers. It is the day when the class struggle is reaffirmed by every conscious worker. 

May Day is the portent of a new world, a classless world, a peaceful world, a world without poverty or misery. A world of abundance. It is the promise of socialism, the real brotherhood of mankind. May Day is a warning to the capitalist class, “Do your damnedest to us but your days are numbered!” May Day proclaims that there is but one race – the human race! 

May Day says the future is ours. More than any other group, the working class suffers from war; and only the working class, in all its strength, can win the struggle for peace. Workers march for freedom from deprivation on May Day. Workers march for equality on this May Day. 

On May Day, workers march shoulder to shoulder, in solidarity, black, brown and white — for democracy and social justice. Workers call for unity of all workers. 

May Day is a time for casting away illusions and preparing for the struggle. It is a time for the working class to heighten its vigilance against its enemies. It is a time to unite real friends to defeat our real enemies.

May Day is not simply a time of celebration of our class. World events serve to remind us that this is also a solemn occasion, a time when we bow our heads in respect for our fellow workers and brothers and sisters who have fallen. On May Day, we remember that the workers’ flag is red for a reason as our traditional labour song goes:

The people’s flag is deepest red,

It shrouded oft our martyred dead,

And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold,

Their hearts’ blood dyed its ev’ry fold.”

Not all those who wave the red flag or claim to speak for the working class actually do. Rather than overthrowing the capitalists, they argued that labor should try to win friends among the capitalist politicians and support one faction against another. For sure, over the past decades the ruling class has made a considerable number of concessions. But what are these gains, really? If you consider the wealth that the working people have produced, when you consider the power and potential for an abundance of the productive forces that the workers themselves have created, then these reforms are shown up for what they really are. They are nothing but crumbs, scraps left over from the table after the capitalists have had their feast.

Our May Day is the day of solidarity.

Arise, ye prisoners of starvation.” 

May Day is the day of the working class, the class that has borne untold sufferings and has nothing, nothing to lose but its chains.

Arise, ye wretched of the earth.”

May Day is the day of the exploited, here and around the globe. You have been despised and spat upon by capital, but now the road to your liberation is clear.

The earth shall rise on new foundations, we have been naught, we shall be all.” 

May Day, is when we pledge to break the power of capital and declare war against these bloodsucking leeches. Their time is over, their days are numbered.

Tis the final conflict, let each stand in his place. The Internationale shall be the human race.”

The Socialist Party cannot be bribed or bought, nor can we be diverted from our struggle in the defence of workers and oppressed people of the world. The Socialist Party advocates a class war that will only end with the complete emancipation of the working class and the total defeat of the capitalist class. In the revolutionary class war to rid the world of the evils of capitalism you will find us ready to volunteer to fight with all our hearts and souls.





https://soymb.com/2016/05/arise-ye-prisoners-of-starvation-arise.html