Author: ajohnstone

The Nationalism of Vaccines

The war on COVID-19 is haunted by lessons from the fight against another virus a decade ago. In the spring of 2009, the H1N1 swine flu virus emerged in the United States and Mexico and spread worldwide. Within weeks, the World Health Organization(WHO) declared it the first pandemic since 1968.
Wealthier governments that had provisional contracts with vaccine makers immediately exercised them, “effectively monopolizing the global vaccine supply,” according to Richard Hatchett, who managed U.S. pandemic flu policy under George W. Bush and returned to advise Obama during the 2009 swine flu pandemic. Hatchett now heads the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). The U.S. alone ordered 250 million doses, and Australia, Brazil, France, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Britain all had vaccine. 
Under pressure from the WHO, those countries ultimately committed to share 10% of their stockpiles with poorer nations. But due to production and distribution snarls, only about 77 million doses were shipped – far less than needed – and only after the disease had peaked in many regions.  If an effective vaccine emerges for the new coronavirus, a replay is possible, experts say. None of the global health authorities believes there will be sufficient supplies to satisfy the immediate demand. Governments will be under tremendous pressure to immunize their own citizenry and get life back to normal, so hoarding remains a serious risk. 



Ronald St. John, a physician who has held government posts on infectious disease control in the United States and Canada, expects a similar scenario with vaccines. “There is going to be a lot of self-interest in terms of the production,” he said. 



In the United States, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a federal agency that funds disease-fighting technology, explicitly gives preference to vaccine projects promising U.S. production capacity.

“We’re asking the American taxpayer to give a lot” to the vaccine effort, so it’s important to ensure U.S. access to any successful vaccine, said Bright, BARDA’s recent chief. 

Many other governments are pouring money into vaccine initiatives with expectations that they will be first in line if a viable vaccine emerges. 
Arcturus Therapeutics, a San Diego biotech, is receiving up to $10 million (8 million pounds) from the Singapore government to develop its mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine candidate in partnership with the Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School. If the vaccine is approved, Singapore gets first access, said Arcturus CEO Joseph Payne. Everything after that, he said, goes to “whoever pays for it.”

“Arcturus is not responsible for the ethics of distribution – governments are – but in order for governments to get the vaccine, they need to pay for it,” Payne said. “The country that will win is the country that stockpiles multiple vaccines at risk.”
In China, a major global producer of vaccines, the government is backing several coronavirus vaccine projects, raising the prospect it will inoculate its 1.4 billion people first.
The World Health Organization announced a “landmark collaboration” across the international community to raise $8 billion to accelerate the coronavirus vaccine development and ensure equitable access worldwide to any successful vaccine. Countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and the Americas announced their participation, but the United States and China, two of the world’s biggest pharma forces, did not.
“There will be no U.S. official participation,” a spokesman for the U.S. mission in Geneva told Reuters



Yuan Qiong, senior legal and policy advisor at Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) Access Campaign explained “There shouldn’t be any patent monopoly and profiteering out of this pandemic.” 











War or Peace?

Global military expenditure reached $1.9 trillion  in 2019, the highest annual sum in real terms since 1988. That sum marked an increase of 3.6% over 2018, the largest annual increase since 2010, according to the latest figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).



Of the 15 countries in the world with the highest defense budgets, six are NATO members: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Their combined military expenditure makes up for almost half of the world’s total figure. In 2019, the total military expenditure of NATO’s 29 member states was some $1.04 trillion. According to the SIPRI report, in 2019 the US was responsible for 38% of global military expenditure, totaling $732 billion. The increase over its 2018 budget alone amounted to the equivalent of Germany’s total expenditure in 2019. Experts  see the increase as a response to China, which ranks in second place after the US when it comes to military spending. Beijing’s budget contributed 14% of global military expenditure in 2019 and rose by more than 5% to $261 billion. China has been increasing its military expenditure steadily since 1994, but its budget has jumped by 85% since 2010. However, in terms of percentage of GDP, this has not changed considerably and almost always lies at 1.9%.



Max Mutschler from the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC), a peace and conflict research institute explained, “Military expenditure is based on worst-case scenarios.” He told DW that while the public often perceives economic conflict between states to be in the foreground, the threat of military conflict remains very present in the background.



“With regard to the tension between the US and China, we do not know if there will be an armed conflict or not. So the militaries in both countries are preparing for this eventuality, and they’re very good when it comes to lobbying for more funds,” he said.



On the Asian continent, the military expenditure of  nuclear power India, is also considerable, rising last year by almost 7% to $71.1 billion.



“The tension with neighboring countries Pakistan and China are the main reasons that the Indian government has increased its expenditure so dramatically,” said Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher with SIPRI.

Saudi Arabia lies well ahead of other Middle Eastern countries, spending $61.9 billion in 2019.



Military expenditure in other countries pales by comparison to the global top spenders. South American states spent “only” $53 billion in 2019, and Brazil alone was responsible for half of that.



Southeast Asian countries totaled around $41 billion.



And the entire continent of Africa spent some $42 billion.  Uganda, for example, increased its budget by 52%.



The COVID-19 pandemic shows that we’ve got our  priorities wrong. Keeping citizens safe is the greatest responsibility of any society. Citizens can only enjoy free, dignified lives when they are secure and prosperous. Since 2003, the world witnessed the SARS, H1N1, MERS, Ebola and Zika virus outbreaks. Nations, in others words, had ample time to prepare for the possibility of a pandemic. But governments  got their priorities wrong and invested billions in arms rather than readying for a potential pandemic disaster.  Increased military spending led to states diverting money away from health care systems, infrastructure networks and environmental protection measures. It is a fact long recognised and acknowledged even by capitalist politicians.

Former US President, General Dwight D. Eisenhower, said in 1953: 



“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.”

Nation-states have failed to recognize the biggest threats to our safety: pandemics, climate change

and environmental destruction and prefer to guard their global trade routes or raw material sources. The pandemic we are facing has made very clear just how globalized our world is today. Something happening in far-away countries can swiftly spread and affect people across the globe. Globalization cannot be wished away. It is here to stay. That means the global community must cooperate not compete and enter into conflict. Only then can our world become a safe place for all and we see the end of armies and armament industries.





From Pandemic Emergency to the Emergence of Socialism

We should not return to the type of society that enabled this pandemic to emerge and spread. We must instead create a new socially just and sustainable world. We, working people, can shut the system down and we have the numbers to break the power of capitalist class and their State. We should send a clear signal that things cannot and must not return to normal. We must transform our broken and inequitable society, and build a new society run by and for us – the working class majority. We seek a world safe not for profit-making, but for people.



Capitalists maximise profits. Capitalism has proved extremely inefficient in its response to the virus. Why return to such a normal? Why fix capitalism yet again, given its cyclical crashes and  costly requirement to keep fixing it? Absurd, isn’ it? The problem is the structure of capitalism and not the particular management team running the capitalist enterprise. Capitalists either cannot or will not hire because to do so is not profitable for them. Why reproduce capitalism that so undemocratically organizes its businesses. Why replace one group of employer dictators with another, when a better alternative exists? Why revert back to a profit system that generates social divisions and inequality, which is regularly unstable?



We must use this opportunity to create a global economy that meets our basic needs while at the same time securing sustainable communities for humanity and a healthy environment for both people and planet. We must end the power of profit-maximising corporations and self-organise production, providing for everyone and assuring everyone to the necessities of life. We can achieve and we deserve a better society than the one we presently have. We can’t know for sure what a successful socialist revolution will look like, but we can say that it will definitely be “ the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority

The Socialist Party rejects capitalism in all its disguises and there is no equivocation on its part — no acceptance of government ownership nor even cooperatives. Ours is the only message worth listening to, and the only one that holds a real promise of the final end of privilege, insecurity, poverty and oppression in all its forms. Let us work  for the great day when the capitalist social parasites who have paralysed society will be banished into the limbo of the past.






Lock and Load against Lockdown





“Reopen America” protest groups in various US states against recent coronavirus lockdown measures were set up by conservative gun lobbyists. The coordinated effort seems to be driven by the apparent long-term aim of building a larger base of support for gun law relaxation.

Between April 8 and 16, at least 34 website addresses  were purchased. These web addresses automatically redirect to pages on pro-gun sites. The registration of so many reopen website addresses in a short period of time led social media users to conclude that the campaign was “astroturfing” — the practice of making a campaign appear grassroots while withholding that it was organized by a single entity.  These reopen websites were for Iowa, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Ohio, each of which has laws allowing open carry of firearms with a permit, with five tracing back to one family in the American Midwest, the Dorrs. These laws are not loose enough for the Dorrs, who are ultra-conservative pro-gun political campaigners.

For example, the “reopen” websites for Ohio, Pennsylvania and Minnesota were registered in quick succession, indicating that they were bought in the same transaction. They also all share the same Google Analytics tracking ID, which is a unique code used to track webpage visits. Websites for Iowa and Wisconsin also use this code, in addition to having been set up on the same day. The active “reopen” websites owned by the Dorrs redirect to anti-lockdown protest pages, mostly on the Dorrs’ pro-gun websites. On top of this, they look the same and contain similar, often identical text. Analyzing the inner workings of the website, namely the HTML code files, helps identify more connections to other pages and groups the Dorrs manage or people they collaborate with.

Unrestricted carry (sometimes referred to as permitless carry or constitutional carry) is already law in a number of US states, but not in any of the states for which the Dorrs have bought “Reopen America” domains. Based on the locations of these political campaigns and their previous political activity, it would appear that the Dorrs have a long-term goal of building a bigger supporter base for the gun lobby, using the coronavirus pandemic unrest as a vehicle.

This widespread online activity has contributed toward the impression that there is large-scale opposition to the lockdown measures. In contrast, nearly 70% of Republican voters and 95 percent of Democratic voters supported a national stay-at-home order, according to recent research by Quinnipiac, a nationwide independent public opinion poll.



https://www.dw.com/en/revealed-how-the-us-gun-lobby-exploits-the-coronavirus-pandemic-to-further-its-aims/a-53230399

Lebanon Slavery

Some 250,000 migrant domestic workers – most from sub-Saharan African countries such as Ethiopia and Ghana, and southeast Asian countries including Nepal and the Philippines – reside in Lebanon. General Security had said in 2017 that two domestic workers die every week in Lebanon.

Domestic workers in Lebanon are legally bound to their employers through the country’s notorious kafala system, which only allows them to end their contracts with the consent of employers.

The system has led to widespread abuse, ranging from the withholding of wages, to physical and sexual assault. Camille Abousleiman, Lebanon’s former labour minister, has called it “modern-day slavery”.
Diala Haidar, a Lebanon campaigner at Amnesty International, told Al Jazeera, “The Lebanese labour law explicitly excludes domestic workers from labour protections enjoyed by other workers such as minimum wage, overtime pay, compensation for unfair dismissal, and social security. The labour law needs to be amended to recognise domestic workers as workers and grant them full labour protections.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/lebanon-arrests-suspect-putting-nigerian-worker-sale-200423135002619.html

Never give up and never give in

A bloggers for world socialism we address social issues central to the concerns of our fellow-workers around the world, including health, migration, peace, climate, poverty, sustainable production, social justice, women, children and gender justice, human rights, indigenous peoples, and much more. Our mission is to help build people and communities ability to manage their own affairs, respecting no sovereign boundaries or national allegiances. The reality is that humanity’s access to  wealth, health and housing have long been imperilled prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Now the health crisis is being used as an excuse to grab political power, to tighten internal security laws and infringe further on  civil liberties and democratic rights. It has resulted in a rise in racist and xenophobic attitudes and a resurgence of populist nationalism around the world.



 But, nevertheless, COVID-19 has paused the unbridled pursuit of profit and capital. When the world reopens we have the task to transform, global and local arrangements to protect humanity and the planet, from the ravages of capitalism and its social inequalities.



Many of the major problems we must overcome are global and national divisions add to the complexity of their solutions. Everyone breathes the same air so pollution in the atmosphere is a world issue.



What we’ve been shown by the COVID-19 pandemic is that it is solidarity or death. However, this coronavirus catastrophe can point towards an alternative future. We find ourselves at an unprecedented moment where there need not be a “return to normal” and to go back to the way they were before. Businessasusual was a highly polluting and an ecologically unsustainable economy locking us into catastrophic climate change. We simply cannot afford to do that. We can do things differently. 


Rather than wanting it all to go back to “normal”, let’s imagine another future where people have everything they require for fulfilling, meaningful and prosperous lives. Where our everyday needs are provided for by sustainable and renewable resources. A future that is equitable, more secure, and more satisfying – and all within our planet’s ecological limits. We know it is in our power to change the way we do things. 


Over the last few months, nearly all of us have adapted our life-styles and changed the way we work in order to protect ourselves and other people from Covid-19. As family, as friends, as neighbours, as co-workers, we have made clear that we value cooperation and compassion more than anything else. We as individuals have taken bold decisions for the collective good. We have been reminded of our sense of community. What we now decide will determine the quality of life for billions of people for generations to come. In order to create a sustainable world, it requires the end of capitalism. The pandemic lockdowns has revealed what the world looks like without as much pollution and without meaningless “work” performed by the exploited for the benefit of the privileged and pampered. Another world is possible, and we’ve just gotten a glimpse of it.





No more capitalism but a culture of care

A new report by the National Priorities Project (NPP) at the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), examining the federal budget illuminates the deep connections between the climate emergency and the U.S. military, arguing that the shift to a green economy requires a just transition away from both fossil fuels and endless war.




The report, entitled No Warming, No War: How Militarism Fuels the Climate Crisis—and Vice Versa (pdf), says that the ongoing coronavirus pandemic “has utterly changed life as we know it” and warns against working toward a return to an old normal which was “defined by unfettered capitalism that thrives on the devastation of our planet, the devaluation of human life, and the use of military force to perpetuate both.” The report also takes aim at the corporations—both military contractors and energy giants—that reap massive profits from the devastation of war and fossil fuel extraction. The analysis specifically calls out Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman as well as BP, Shell, Chevron, and ExxonMobil.




“On a local and global scale, humanity and community have been co-opted by profit and violence. This ‘normal’ has now brought us to the brink of an existential crisis as climate change continues nearly unabated,” co-authors Lorah Steichen and Lindsay Koshgarian write in the foreword. “In the face of both COVID-19 and the climate crisis, we urgently need to shift from a culture of war to a culture of care.” On a warming planet, migration is rising. Instead of responding with solidarity, the US is escalating border militarization while defunding climate solutions.



Half of all international wars since 1973 have been linked to fossil fuel resources, particularly in the oil-rich Middle East. According to NPP:

 “The U.S. military spends an estimated $81 billion a year to protect the world’s oil supplies—even before accounting for the Iraq war.”



The U.S. military—with an annual budget exceeding $700 billion—is “among the biggest polluters” on the planet, producing about 59 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions per year, more than countries such as Sweden, Denmark, and Portugal, according to the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. A B-52 consumes as much fuel in an hour as the average car driver uses in 7 years. “To achieve climate justice, we must transform the extractive economy we have now that is harming people and ecosystems,” the report says. “Resisting militarization is core to building an economy that works for people and the planet. As such, we must pursue solutions to the climate crisis that challenge the violent and oppressive systems that have fuelled war and warming for generations.”



One of the report’s five conclusions is there is enough for everybody.



Planet of the Humans (video)

Michael Moore, Jeff Gibbs (2020). Planet of the Humans | Full Documentary By Socialist Party of Canada











This 2020 Gibbs-Moore exposé compliments the case for non-market Socialism rather well. 




It’s fact-filled sleuthing explicitly cites the profit motive as root cause of the double-speak hypocrisy much of the ‘green movement’ suffers — a movement which is doing little if anything to mitigate climate warming or ecological collapse in authentic and meaningful ways — if what Gibbs & Moore report is correct.




This is not to denigrate the well-meaning intentions behinds the sentiments of making the earth a greener saner place; the documentary more importantly shows the obscured control by global capital usurping well-known non-profits that claim they are fighting the good fight for the environment when in fact they are naively complicit in its delay. 




The documentary further underscores what Gibbs and Moore see as the sea-change behaviour needed to move away from using incredibly wasteful amounts of energy capitalists demand to keep their profits circulating; they illustrate it is not average citizen clamouring for such energy, but rather the swindling class who currently own and monopolize the global means of life for solely their own gain.




A film worth spending the 1hr 45mins viewing, if for anything, to inform oneself on the growing debate to chuck capitalism for good — a sentiment implicitly echoed by popular groups such as ‘FridaysForFuture’ and ‘Extinction Rebellion,’ who although having fast growing global influence, appear to have cultural amnesia about the futility of reformism to chart deep and systemic improvement of society where-in equal access to the means of life — one free of the capitalist yoke — is globally generalized. 




The film is free to view until May 21, 2020 

Pygmy Lance





The Anti-Union Campaign Continues

US corporations are cracking down on unionization efforts as workers try to organize. 



Companies, including grocery chains Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods, airport concession operators, local authorities and even a furniture company owned by the billionaire Warren Buffett have moved to control efforts to unionize as workers become increasingly concerned about workplace safety during the pandemic emergency.



As workers on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic have organized protests and strikes, several employers have responded by stepping up attempts to oppose unionization, repeal workers’ rights won in bargaining, and fire workers en masse who had recently publicized intent to organize a union in their workplace.



The Trader Joe’s chairman and CEO, Dan Bane, sent a  blatant anti-union letter to all employees on 31 March opposing labor unions, and calling attempts to recruit staff “a distraction”, the latest in a series of memos and actions taken by the company to suppress union organizing efforts calling for hazard pay and adequate protections for grocery store workers during the pandemic.



A Trader Joe’s employee in New Jersey said, “It’s in bad taste and shows the greed this company has instead of taking proactive measures to keep the crew and customers safe.”



Concession workers at Orlando international airport have filed official complaints against their employer, HMSHost, over the lack of coronavirus safety protections, which included continuing to hold anti-union captive audience meetings during the pandemic. A union election for workers to join Unite Here scheduled for late March was delayed and is currently being rescheduled due to the pandemic.



“I tried to refuse to go because we were short-staffed,” said Rosanny Tejeda, a Starbucks barista at Orlando international airport for about one year before recently being furloughed. Tejeda claimed the meeting did not adhere to social distancing or take into account any coronavirus safety precautions, and she was targeted throughout the meeting for wearing a union pin. “They didn’t care about our health when they sent us to those meetings,” said Tejeda. “To them, the union was a more important issue than the coronavirus. They made sure to give us papers about the union, but didn’t give us training or protective equipment for us in the stores.”
Citing the pandemic, the manager of Clark county, Nevada, unilaterally suspended all union contracts with the county. The decision affects about 9,000 workers, including hospital workers at University Medical Center of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas.
The Teamsters union has filed federal unfair labor practice charges of unlawful termination against CORT furniture, a subsidiary of billionaire Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, accusing the furniture rental company of retaliating against workers for supporting unionization just as the pandemic broke in the US.



Anthony Salcedo, a driver at the warehouse for nearly four years who was laid off, said: “They’re telling us the reason why they terminated us is because of work reduction, but how is there work reduction if you are hiring contractors to do our work? It’s obvious why we were terminated. It wasn’t because of work reduction, it was because we were supporting a union.”
Several other companies have been accused of opposing union organizing efforts among workers during the pandemic. Amazon-owned Whole Foods is using a data-powered heat mapping tool to monitor unionization risks among its over 500 stores throughout the US, as workers have held sick-out protests in response to a lack of protections for workers during the pandemic. Workers at the online clothing retailer Everlane and the art logistics company Uovo have filed federal labor charges accusing the companies of firing workers during the pandemic for union organizing.



“It’s an absolute disgrace they would take advantage of a pandemic to frustrate workers’ ability to organize and get better representation for themselves so they’re not risking their lives to perform essential services,” said Celine McNicholas, government affairs director at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). “This is an extreme moment we’re in, but unfortunately this is the traditional employer playbook in opposing workers’ efforts to organize and collectively bargain for better pay and better health and safety provisions,” added McNicholas.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/23/labor-unions-trader-joes-workers-coronavirus-us

To CCS or not?

How do we significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions before it’s too late?



Some say by carbon capture and storage (CCS), what is in essence the process of separating carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air, or from gases produced in electricity generation and industrial processes, then injecting the captured CO2 into geological rock formations typically located several kilometers underground? 
CCS technology features in a number of government and industry proposals. But it is still not on track and is in fact far behind where it will need to be within decades to meet the necessary targets for global emission reductions.
Part of the problem is how these technologies are still very much at the developmental stage, despite using them since the 1970s
“In terms of the actual efficiency of carbon capture, it’s not nearly as effective as people claim it is,” said Mark Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University. His research into two CCS projects, factoring in production and processing emissions, found they trapped only between 10-11 percent of net carbon emissions averaged over 20 years. “It’s never better to capture carbon than it is to use that money to replace coal or gas,” Jacobson said.

Questions also surround just how meaningfully CCS technologies are currently contributing to carbon emission reductions. For example, CCS is being used to funnel CO2 back underground to stimulate oil fields that are running dry, in a process called enhanced oil recovery (EOR) — a way, say CCS critics, not so much of reversing course on global warming but of prolonging the life-blood of the fossil fuel industry. Strictly speaking, such technologies fall under the umbrella of carbon capture, utilization and storage, or CCUS.



“You have biofuels. Nuclear power. Coal and carbon capture. They all claim that they can do things, and all they need is another billion dollars to solve it,” said Jacobson. “It becomes a part of what people assume is working, whereas really, it’s just a pyramid scheme.”



https://truthout.org/articles/is-carbon-capture-and-storage-a-climate-solution-or-a-pyramid-scheme/