Hunger adds to Myamar’s misery

 Food aid reliance is set to triple to 3.4 million people in Myanmar within months, the World Food Program has warned. The WFP in its press release blamed three primary causes: Myanmar’s February military coup, “pre-existing poverty,” and the global coronavirus pandemic’s spread across Myamar.

WFP’s director for Myanmar, Stephen Anderson, said families were already “skipping meals” in the 10 poorest suburbs of Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city.

“More and more poor people have lost their jobs and are unable to afford food,” said Anderson, depicting a “sharp” rise in “hunger and desperation.”

Prices for staples — such as rice and cooking oil — had risen nationwide, especially in Myanmar’s border areas of Chin, Kachin, Rakhine and Shan states. For example, said Anderson, rice prices had soared by up to 43% in some townships of Kachin state and cooking oil by 32%. Prices for fuel had increased by “roughly 30% nationwide,” he said.

“The world must act immediately to address this humanitarian catastrophe.” 

In Myanmar’s eastern Karen border region — near Thailand — 24,000 subsistence rice farmers had been displaced by recent military air and ground mortar strikes, said David Eubank of the Christian aid group, Free Burma Rangers. Unable to safely return home to tend their paddy fields, “you’re looking at a six-month problem of no food,” said Eubank.

UN: 3 million facing hunger in coup-hit Myanmar | News | DW | 22.04.2021

End the travesty of charity

 More than 54,000 food parcels went to children in Wales between April 2020 and March 2021, the Trussell Trust charity says – one parcel every 10 minutes but called the figure “the tip of the iceberg”.

Trussell Trust said it provided 145,828 parcels to adults and youngsters. It said the need for emergency food was driven by poverty, with its research showing 94% of people referred to them were destitute – meaning they cannot afford the essentials. 

High rates of unemployment and record numbers of redundancies meant more people than ever needed social security to provide a “lifeline to stay afloat”, the charity said.

Wales operations manager Susan Lloyd-Selby said no-one “should face the indignity of needing emergency food”. Ms Lloyd-Selby urged voters to write to Senedd candidates asking them to commit to working to end the need for food banks.

Food banks: One parcel given to children in Wales ‘every 10 minutes’ – BBC News

We can assure Lloyd-Selby that the Socialist Party candidate, Brian Johnson for Cardiff Central, has the only answer to the problem of food insecurity and that is a new form of economics – socialism.

Death Pays a Dividend

 



Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca—three of the world’s top coronavirus vaccine manufacturers—have paid out a combined $26 billion in dividends and stock buybacks to their shareholders over the past year, a sum that could fully fund the cost of inoculating Africa’s entire 1.3 billion-person population.

Pfizer has paid out $8.44 billion in dividends over the past 12 months. Johnson & Johnson, which received $1.5 billion in public money, paid out $10.5 billion in dividends.

Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna are projecting revenues of $33.5 billion this year from their mRNA vaccines.

 According to the People’s Vaccine Alliance, “One of the reasons Pharma companies have been able to generate such large profits is because of intellectual property rules that restrict production to a handful of companies,” alluding to an international agreement that bars generic manufacturers from replicating vaccine formulas.

Heidi Chow, senior campaigns and policy manager at Global Justice Now, said in a statement. “It’s morally bankrupt for rich country leaders to allow a small group of corporations to keep the vaccine technology and know-how under lock and key while selling their limited doses to the highest bidder.”

“Vaccine apartheid is not a natural phenomenon but the result of governments stepping back and allowing corporations to call the shots,” said Anna Marriott, health policy manager at Oxfam International. “It is appalling that Big Pharma is making huge payouts to wealthy shareholders in the face of this global health emergency.” She continued, “This is a public health emergency, not a private profit opportunity,” Marriott said. “We should not be letting corporations decide who lives and who dies while boosting their profits. We need a people’s vaccine, not a profit vaccine.”

The soaring shares of vaccine makers has created a new wave of billionaires.

BioNTech founder Ugur Sahin is now worth $5.9 billion and Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel is worth $5.2 billion.

“Instead of creating new vaccine billionaires,” Marriott observed, “we need to be vaccinating billions in developing countries.”

Big Pharma’s ‘Appalling’ $26 Billion in Shareholder Payouts Could Fund Vaccines for All of Africa: Report | Common Dreams News

Patents Or Patients?

 The humanitarian group Médecins Sans Frontières, (MSF), Doctors Without Borders, has pleaded once more for the United States, European Union member nations, and other rich countries to immediately end their opposition to South Africa and India’s patent waiver proposal, which would enable the mass production of generic coronavirus vaccines to meet the developing world’s dire needs.

“In this Covid-19 pandemic, we are once again faced with issues of scarcity, which can be addressed through diversification of manufacturing and supply capacity and ensuring the temporary waiver of relevant intellectual property,” Dr. Maria Guevara, international medical secretary of Doctors Without Borders, said in a statement“We urge all countries in opposition to this, including the U.S. and the E.U., to stand on the right side of history and join hands with those in support. It is about saving lives at the end, not protecting systems.”

With strict intellectual property rules in place, low-income countries have been left largely without access to life-saving vaccines as infections continue to surge across the globe, leading experts to fear the emergence of vaccine-resistant strains that could prolong the global pandemic.

However, the U.S. and European countries have repeatedly refused, denying the World Trade Organization (WTO) the consensus support necessary to move forward with the waiver and keeping vaccine production under the control of profit-driven pharmaceutical companies that have lobbied aggressively against the proposal.

Dr. Márcio da Fonseca, infectious disease adviser for Doctors Without Borders’ Access Campaign, said that “we have learned the hard lessons of the past of having to take a country-by-country and product-by-product approach of removing intellectual property barriers impeding access to lifesaving treatments; it is not sufficient and doesn’t provide no expeditious option for this global pandemic. At a time when more than three million lives have already been lost to Covid-19,” da Fonseca added, “we urge countries to take all possible measures, including supporting this waiver, to be able to protect everyone, everywhere during this pandemic.”

‘It Is About Saving Lives’: Doctors Without Borders Calls on US, EU to Stop Blocking Vaccine Patent Waiver | Common Dreams News



Listen to the People

Mark Lowcock, the coordinator of the UN’s aid relief operation since 2017 and the UN’s humanitarian agency head,  will say this week that “The humanitarian system is set up to give people in need what international agencies and donors think is best, and what we have to offer, rather than giving people what they themselves say they most need.”

“In Chad and Cox’s Bazar [in Bangladesh] and other places too, people in dire humanitarian need are frequently selling aid they have been given, to buy something else they want more – a clear indication that what is being provided does not meet people’s needs and preferences. After the central Sulawesi earthquake in 2018, almost half of displaced households reported shelter as one of their most important and immediate priorities. Yet only a small fraction of people got immediate help with that. Unfortunately, these are not isolated examples. Last year, more than half the people surveyed in Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Chad, Nigeria, Somalia and Uganda said that the aid they received did not cover their most important needs. In Chad, only 12% of people surveyed were positive about the aid they received.”

Lowcock admits the need for agencies to be more sensitive to the views of those in need of aid has been part of the development reform agenda for two decades. But there has been limited “piecemeal” progress owing to the lack of any incentive structure for aid agencies to respond.

“In many places, we have information on what people want and how they want it. The problem is we are not consistently acting on that information. Ultimately, organisations or decision-makers can choose to listen to people and be responsive, or they can choose not to. There are no real consequences for the choice they make. There are weak incentives to push them in the right direction.”

“If we hold such a mirror up to the system, humanitarian agencies collectively will see that we are simply not adequately listening and responding to what people say they want.”

Lowcock explains underfunding is unsustainable unless the causes of humanitarian need – famine, displacement, conflict and climate change – are addressed at the source.

“Today one in 33 people worldwide needs humanitarian assistance or protection – more than at any time since the second world war. Almost 80 million people are displaced by conflict and violence. Wars last twice as long as in the early 1990s.”

Humanitarian system is failing people in crisis, says UN aid chief | Humanitarian response | The Guardian



Hell on Earth Day


 “Our demands most moderate are – We only want the earth!” – James Connolly

Another of those special annual events, a special designated to mobilise public opinion and it was first observed in 1970 – now over half a century ago. Its longevity is a sign of its lack of success. Or planet is not ruled by sentiment nor social  justice but by power. Capitalists control presidents and parliaments. They ignore the opinions of the peoples of the world. They neglect organisations that have been established to protect the Earth. Their end determines their actions; their economic laws supersede all others. We need to recognise that we’re fighting capitalism.

 On this Earth Day and in the year of the upcoming COP26 summit we are faced with perhaps the most serious problem ever to confront the human race and yet most scientists are still continuing to support a system of society which is the basic cause of the problem. If these experts were forced to sit down and apply their techniques of scientific investigation to human society and its evolution. they would come up with only one answer: the establishment of a system of society where production will be for direct use, goods and services will be free to all, and where all will have a direct democratic input because we are all social equals. Yet for them socialism is unthinkable, something utterly impracticable and unjustifiable but placing ones faith and trust and hope in the very agency that created the climate crisis is not at all illusory.

They turn a deaf ear and a blind eye to the words of the visionary and humanitarian scientist, the late Carl Sagan:

Humans have evolved gregariously. We delight in each other’s company; we care for one another. We cooperate. Altruism is built into us. We have brilliantly deciphered some of the patterns of Nature. We have sufficient motivation to work together and the ability to figure out how to do it. If we are willing to contemplate nuclear war and the wholesale destruction of our emerging global society, should we not also be willing to contemplate a wholesale restructuring of our societies?”

The scientific world full understands the consequences of no change and business-as-usual. Climate change will wreak its havoc on the basics of life: vital resources that include food, water, land, and energy. This will be devastating. the future effects of climate change to predict the following with reasonable confidence. Rising sea levels will in the next half-century erase many coastal areas, destroying large cities, critical infrastructure (including roads, railways, ports, airports, pipelines, refineries, and power plants), and prime agricultural land. Diminished rainfall and prolonged droughts will turn once-verdant croplands into dust bowls, reducing food output and turning millions into climate refugees. Extreme weather events, severe storms and intense heat-waves will kill crops, ignite forest fires, cause floods, and destroy critical infrastructure. No one can predict for sure how much will be lost as a result of this onslaught. But it is already clear that we are now heading to-wards a world of chaos.

Countless corporations have co-opted Earth Day for their  PR messages. It has become just another marketing opportunity for “ethical capitalism” by “going green.” The sad truth behind this laudable concern for the environment, is it is the only way capitalism can think of doing anything and that is by making loads of money out of it. Green capitalism’s basic idea is that if we just price the environment correctly, traded carbon credits on the stock-exchange  creating new markets for techno-fixes and monetarising “Nature” itself then everyone and the environment will win. Capitalist culture has ridden roughshod over biological and cultural diversity and has impoverished both people and the environment and yet we are to believe it is the solution to global warming. Pricing something is not the same as valuing it. Monetarising something does not express its use value, only its exchange value. Capitalism is bound to come into conflict with nature. It cannot go green because no business will take action which endangers their profits, just as no government will pass legislation that puts their capitalists at a disadvantage to its foreign rivals. True, it might be argued that international measures have been and can be taken to solve the worst environmental problems, from the banning of the pesticide DDT to the reduced the use of CFCs. However, energy production and global warming are far different, being integrated as closely as they could be in capitalist production in general. Combating them would not be a mere matter of disrupting the manufacture of aerosols or weedkillers, but of changing something which is part and parcel of the capitalist system and on which all companies depend.

Capitalism encourages competition which results in conflict not co-operation. Socialism will ultimately be a steady-state, zero-growth system of production and distribution and therefore can remain more in balance with the natural environment. Production will be for use, not for buying and selling on the market and needs will be determined by people and fulfilled by people.

We want the Earth – and we want it now

 


EU Emissions Target

 As we have seen so many times climate proposals agreed with by governments are often playing with figures on paper.

After 14 hours of intensive negotiations, representatives of the EU’s member states and parliament  a new EU target of a 55% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 has been agreed and immediately described as a “farce” by environmental groups.

Wendel Trio, the director of Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, an alliance of environmental NGOs, said: “The ‘at least 55% emission reduction target for 2030’ is not in line with the Paris agreement’s ambition to limit temperature rise to 1.5C by the end of the century.” Trio said the target had been “rushed by EU lawmakers to bring something to the leaders’ summit organised by the US”. “This is definitely not the kind of climate law that will help the EU to lead the global efforts to tackle climate change,” he said.

Barbara Mariani, senior policy officer for climate and energy with the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), said the target translated to only a 52.8% cut in actual emissions from polluting sectors as the larger figure took into account emissions that could potentially be absorbed. Under current measures the EU already expects to reduce emissions by 46% of 2030.

“Today’s agreement is not a victory for climate action, it’s a farce,” Mariani said. “We are also baffled to see that the council [of member states] rejected a proposal to extend the EU’s climate neutrality target to all member states, which risks triggering lack of accountability at national level and creating a two-speed Europe in which some countries will inevitably lag behind.”

New EU target to cut carbon emissions by at least 55% disappoints experts | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian

Another report on US inequality

 



According to the report by financial news website Finbold as 2020 ended, the richest 10% of Americans possessed just under 70% of the nation’s household wealth. 

The top 10% of rich individuals accounted for 69.2% of wealth, including real estate, bank accounts, stocks, and other assets.

Nearly half of those assets are concentrated in the wealth of the top 1%, who own a combined $38.91 trillion.

Nearly $47 trillion is owned by the remaining top 9% of rich households. 

The bottom 50% of earners, meanwhile, control a combined $2.49 trillion—or 2% of U.S. household wealth.

“The lower class mainly comprises service workers who don’t have the pleasure of working from home,” Finbold editor-in-chief Oliver Scott wrote. “This group comprised the massive job cuts witnessed amid the pandemic. The middle-class individuals were able to work from home while retaining their income.”

The analysis shows a “staggering difference” between the wealthiest Americans and lower-income Americans which has grown in the last three decades, Scott wrote.

 Between the fourth quarter of 1990 and the fourth quarter of 2020, the collective wealth of the top 1% grew by 675%, from $5.02 trillion to nearly $39 trillion. 

Meanwhile, the wealth of the bottom 50% grew by less than $1 trillion to just $2.49 trillion over 30 years.

Analysis Shows Richest 10% Now Own Nearly 70% of All Household Wealth in US | Common Dreams News

Yet another report describing the extreme wealth inequality that exists in the USA. The ‘bottom’ 50% has only 2% of the society’s wealth so it begs the question: what percentage of the society’s wealth does the 10% and the 1%  people produce?

World Socialist 3rd Issue



The third issue of the World Socialist is out now!

It feature’s an article on COVID-19’s lab-leak hypothesis, an elaboration on Clause One of our Declaration of Principles, an article on how politicians are bourgeois puppets, a commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the Kronstadt Rebellion, an explanation of the power crisis that hit Texas in February, an article on the rank class inequality of our legal system, an examination of the immigration myth, another contribution to our ‘How I Became a Socialist’ series, as well as review and funnies!

The PDF version is free here:

World Socialist No. 3 (Spring 2021)

and hardcopies can be bought for $9 from Lulu.com here:

World Socialist No. 3 (Spring 2021)

Feedback’s always appreciated 

The Neglected Refugee Crisis

 In the three years since large-scale protests in their country triggered a complex social and political crisis, 108,000 Nicaraguans have been forced to flee their country since 2018, with 85,000 of them seeking refuge in Costa Rica. 

“While the needs of the Nicaraguans continue to grow, the world’s attention span seems to shorten,” said Milton Moreno, UNHCR Representative in Costa Rica. ”Without a prompt and adequate response, we risk yet another situation of completely preventable and unnecessary suffering.”

Assessments in the country showed that pandemic-related restrictions have forced many Nicaraguan refugees and asylum-seekers to go hungry, eating only once a day or sometimes not at all. Unemployment has soared, leading many to borrow money or work informally in exchange for food.

However, funding for the response is falling short. UNHCR’s operation in Costa Rica has received only 11 per cent of the US$32 million needed to help refugees meet their most basic needs and support the authorities to expedite processing of asylum claims.

“Costa Rica and UNHCR cannot address these challenges alone. We call on the international community to help us help the refugees,” added Moreno.

UNHCR calls for more support for Nicaraguans forced to flee – Nicaragua | ReliefWeb