The Sweaters and the Sweated



 Indian workers in factories supplying the supermarket chains Marks and Spencer, Tesco and Sainsbury’s, and the fashion brand Ralph Lauren, told the BBC they are being subjected to exploitative conditions. These kinds of brands do not own or operate factories in India, which creates distance between them and working conditions there, but one owner of a clothing supplier – who did not want to be named – told the BBC that if brands push for cheaper clothes it can leave suppliers with no choice but to cut corners to meet orders.

“It’s the brand who wants to maximize the profit. So, they push you to a level wherein you have to do the exploitation in order to survive,” he said. The owner, who used to supply a major UK brand not mentioned in this story, described some factory audit processes as a “sham”. “The factory is aware when the auditors are coming, so they keep everything in perfect condition before,” he said. “The moment the audit is over, everything goes back to normal, which means exploitation and non compliance.” He said that poor checks and balances, combined with a lack of responsibility by the brands, makes it hard to stamp out that exploitation. “It is the way of working in the textile industry, it’s just not India, it’s everywhere.”

Women working at a Ralph Lauren supplier said they had been forced to stay overnight to complete orders, sometimes requiring them to sleep on the factory floor.

“We’re made to work continuously, often through the night, sleeping at 3am then waking up by 5am for another full day,” one woman said in an interview. “Our bosses don’t care. They’re only bothered about production,” she said.

Workers at the supermarket supplier said they had been made to endure conditions which would be unacceptable for staff employed by the same brands in the UK.

“We don’t get toilet breaks, we don’t get time to drink water on shift. We barely get time to eat lunch,” one woman said.

She said a manager would sometimes stand behind staff in the canteen and blow a whistle to send them back to work.

Another employee said staff were forced to work overtime and prevented from going home until extra work was finished.

“They’ve increased our workload. We’re forced to stay late to finish it – or they yell at us and threaten to fire us. We’re scared as we don’t want to lose our jobs.”

Several women who spoke to the BBC described a climate of fear at the factory supplying Ralph Lauren. They said managers did not give them notice to work additional hours, instead threatening them with the sack if they were unable to stay on.

“The supervisor always shouts at us,” one woman said. “If we make any error in stitching, I’ll be taken to the master who is very scary. The master will start swearing and shouting at us. It’s a terrifying experience”

Another woman, a widow who supports her family financially, said: “They ask us to work so late I can’t even feed my children at night. They shouldn’t treat us like slaves, they should give us respect,” she said.

The women working at these garment factories all live in poverty in a rural area of South India. The charity Action Aid, which supports more than 1,200 female garment workers across 45 villages in this specific region, told the BBC that forced overtime, verbal abuse and poor working conditions were routine at the factories in question.

Allegations such as these are not confined to the garment industry. Low wages and weak labour laws have long made India an attractive place for foreign brands looking to outsource work. Unions are rare and virtually absent in the private sector, making informal and contract workers especially vulnerable. While inspections are mandatory, rampant corruption and a sluggish system has meant that factories are rarely held to account for breaking the law. The claims appear to violate India’s Factories Act, which states that no worker should exceed more than 48 hours a week (or 60 hours with overtime), nor should they be made to work for more than nine hours in one day. The law also states that women should only work night shifts if they choose to do so.

The garment industry draws more attention because it’s driven by exports and counts some of the world’s biggest brands as among its clients. India is the world’s second-largest manufacturer and exporter of garments after China. India’s garment makers directly employ about 12.9 million people in factories and millions more outside, including their own homes, according to a 2019 report that investigated working conditions in the sector.



And as profits are squeezed, women often find themselves losing out. Payslips seen by the BBC show women working in garment factories can earn as little as £2.50 per day, making items which, in some cases, sell for hundreds of pounds. More than 40% of workers surveyed by Action Aid India reported that their average monthly income was in the range of Rs. 2000-5000. (£20-£50).

“Women are undervalued and underpaid throughout global supply chains,” said Ether Mariaselvam, the regional manager at Action Aid’s Chennai office.

All of the workers who spoke to the BBC described living in impoverished conditions and said they struggled to survive on their salaries. One woman working at the Ralph Lauren supplier said she supported her entire family on a wage of around 6,000 rs (£61 per month), after deductions.

The Asia Floor Wage Alliance organisation which advocates for higher salaries for garment workers in the region, has set a monthly living wage in India of at least 18,727 rs (£190). But according to payslips seen by the BBC, neither of the factories we investigated appeared to be paying their workers anything close to the Asia Floor Wage Alliance recommended minimum amount.

Anna Bryher, from the advocacy group Labour behind the Label, said it was the responsibility of brands to ensure fair and safe working conditions.

“If you’re a brand and you’re making clothing in different countries around the world then you need to look at whether you’re paying your workers enough to live with dignity,” she said. “It’s your responsibility as the company at the top of the supply chain to know what is happening in your supply chain and to make sure that it’s fair.”

Local labour laws were not doing enough to address exploitation, the push for change needs to come from the brands themselves,” argues Vivek Soundararajan, a senior lecturer at Bath University who researches global supply chains. “Most checks and balances do not include workers voices, they do not include what workers actually need,” he said. “I think the brand should take the full responsibility … They may not run the factory, but they get all the benefits.”



https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54960346





The Grenfell Fake Safety Tests

 Executives who sold combustible insulation for use on Grenfell Tower perpetrated a “fraud on the market” by rigging a fire test and making “misleading” claims about it, the public inquiry has heard.

Celotex, a subsidiary of the French construction materials company Saint-Gobain, behaved in a “completely unethical” way, admitted Jonathan Roper, its former assistant product manager. Roper worked on two fire tests of the foam panels and subsequent sales plans as the company tried to grab a slice of a £10m-a-year insulation foam market.

In the Grenfell fire on 14 June 2017, the foam, known as RS5000, fuelled the flames and released toxic gases and smoke. The foam was withdrawn from the market nine days later.

Roper said the firm had been “dishonest” by “over-engineering” a cladding fire safety test to achieve a pass. A first test in February 2014 failed in 26 minutes, with flames engulfing the rig. But after changing some of the materials used around the insulation, including adding concealed fire-retardant panels, a second test three months later passed and was used to market the foam boards as safe for high-rise buildings.

“Did you realise at the time that … this would be a fraud on the market?” asked Millett.

“Yes, I did,” replied Roper.” Asked if he could have gone to the senior management with his concerns, he replied that they were all in the meeting about the marketing strategy. “I was 22 or 23, first job, I thought this was standard practice, albeit it did sit very uncomfortably with me.”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/16/fire-test-for-grenfell-foam-cladding-panels-was-rigged-admits-ex-employee

Musk makes Millions

 



In a week tech entrepreneur Elon Musk personal fortune has shot up by more than $15bn (£11.3bn). Musk is poised to become the world’s third richest person.

On Monday, it was announced that his electric car company Tesla has been accepted into the S&P 500, a major US stock market index. The California-based car firm would be the biggest new entrant onto the US index, with a stock market value of over $400bn. Musk’s 20% stake in Tesla his net worth rose to $117.5bn, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

His wealth has jumped $90bn this year

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54958293

Hate Crimes Rise



 Hate crimes in the United States rose to the highest level in more than a decade.

The FBI’s annual report defines hate crimes as those motivated by bias based on a person’s race, religion or sexual orientation, among other categories.

There were 7,314 hate crimes last year, up from 7,120 the year before – and approaching the 7,783 of 2008.  There was a nearly 7 percent increase in religion-based hate crimes, with 953 reports of crimes targeting Jews and Jewish institutions last year, up from 835 the year before. The FBI said the number of hate crimes against African Americans dropped slightly to 1,930, from 1,943. Anti-Hispanic hate crimes, however, rose to 527 in 2019, from 485 in 2018. And the total number of hate crimes based on a person’s sexual orientation stayed relatively stable, with one fewer crime reported last year, compared with the year before, though there were 20 more hate crimes against gay men reported.

 Margaret Huang. president of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which tracks hates groups, said, “Hate crimes are consistently under-reported due to the federal government’s failure to mandate hate crime data collection at the state and local levels.” 

Last year, only 2,172 law enforcement agencies out of about 15,000 participating agencies across the country reported hate crime data to the FBI, the bureau said. A large number of police agencies appeared not to submit any hate crime data. While the number of agencies reporting hate crimes increased, the number of agencies participating in the program actually dropped from the year before. In 2016 found that more than 2,700 city police and county sheriff’s departments across the country had not submitted a single hate crime report for the FBI’s annual crime tally during the previous six years.

“The total severity of the impact and damage caused by hate crimes cannot be fully measured without complete participation in the FBI’s data collection process,” the Anti-Defamation League’s president, Jonathan Greenblatt, said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/16/hate-crimes-rise-to-10-year-high-killings-highest-ever-fbi

An Admission of Failure

  David Beasley told  the Paris Peace Forum that  “When I arrived at the WFP as Executive Director three years ago, the number of people on the brink of starvation was 80 million. That number spiked up to 135-145 million people in the last few years because of man-made conflict,” he said.  “Now, COVID comes on the scene and with economic deterioration and the ripple effect around the world, we’re moving from 135 million people on the brink of starvation to 270 million.”

 The 2020 Nobel Peace Prize-winning agency continues  “providing more aid than ever before”. 

The WFP spent over $8 billion in humanitarian assistance in 2020, but Beasley estimates that it will need twice that amount next year. He says the international community must put more resources into combating starvation.  He said. “Let me be clear – if we don’t get the money we need in the strategic locations, you will have famine, destabilisation and mass migration. It’s that simple.”

http://www.ipsnews.net/2020/11/wfp-focus-on-starvation-destabilisation-and-migration-to-avert-a-covid-19-global-food-crisis/

American Health Care – Who Cares?

 The National Nurses United (NNU) reports that hospitals are raising costs for healthcare by as much as 18 times over the actual cost of services—hitting Covid-19 patients with medical costs amounting to tens of thousands of dollars. 

“These are not markups for luxury condos, they are for the most basic necessity of your life: your health,” tweeted NNU on Monday. 

The 100 most expensive U.S. hospitals charge up to $1,808 for every $100 of their costs. Nationwide, hospitals’ markups for healthcare costs have doubled over the past two decades, with medical centers charging an average of $417 for every $100 they actually spend providing care.

 In another recent study by FAIR Health found that average hospital charges for a Covid-19 patient with no comorbidity or complication were $42,486, while patients with major complications during their treatment are charged an average of $74,310.

Private Health insurance Companies do not provide healthcare – They only pay the bills. For this ‘service’, they skim 20% +/- off the top for themselves, leaving less of your money for your care. 

Private Insurance companies have no incentive to keep prices down in fact the more healthcare costs go up, the more money THEY make.

Private-based insurance companies make their money by DENYING Healthcare NOT by PROVIDING healthcare.

For Profit insurance means Less healthcare = more profit. How will that motive affect their decisions for you and your family?

Private-based insurance still leaves you with Corporate Death Panels. Their requirement for profit sits between you and your doctor and dictates what care is available to you, or not.

Private-based insurance still includes co-pays, deductibles, limits, MEDICAL BANKRUPTCY, and for most, ties you to your employer. If you lose your job, you probably lose your healthcare care.

The United States does not have a Health CARE Problem — It has some of the finest medical care, medical doctors, and medical equipment in the entire world.   What it does have is the WORST Health INSURANCE Problem on the planet!!!

The ancient Greek oath is, ‘First, Do No Harm…’  and the modern interpretation is, ‘…First, Do Nothing For Free!’

Socialism or continued barbarism! The whole damn system has got to go.


From here
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/11/16/study-detailing-scandalous-hospital-price-gouging-during-pandemic-proves-medicare

Pandemic and the Poor

  The lifting of the first COVID-19 lockdown earlier this year did little to improve the incomes of people in Britain who lost out from the restrictions, and lower-earning households have borne the brunt of the hit, a  Resolution Foundation said in a report.

Adults in highest 20% income band, or an average of 64,000 pounds ($84,400) a year, were more likely to have seen their family budgets improve than deteriorate from before the pandemic as many managed to save more.

By contrast, low-income households on 13,000 pounds a year were more than twice as likely to have seen their budgets deteriorate.

With unemployment on the rise in Britain, the proportion of adults reporting a drop in incomes improved only slightly to 23% between July and September from 27% in the April-June period.

Three-in-ten of the adults who took a sustained income hit were unable to afford some basic household costs such as heating and fresh fruit and vegetables, the report said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-incomes/end-of-lockdown-did-little-for-incomes-of-uks-hardest-hit-study-idUSKBN27V0RR