The current infodemic has been worsened by the global scale of the health crisis and by the contributions of social media influencers and some world leaders. Brasil’s Bolsonaro has dismissed Covid-19 as a “fantasy” and a “small flu”, even as cases have been overwhelming hospitals, morgues and cemeteries across Latin America’s largest country. He recently also fired his health minister and joined protests in the capital Brasilia against shutdown measures imposed by governors.
War or Peace?
Global military expenditure reached $1.9 trillion in 2019, the highest annual sum in real terms since 1988. That sum marked an increase of 3.6% over 2018, the largest annual increase since 2010, according to the latest figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Of the 15 countries in the world with the highest defense budgets, six are NATO members: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Their combined military expenditure makes up for almost half of the world’s total figure. In 2019, the total military expenditure of NATO’s 29 member states was some $1.04 trillion. According to the SIPRI report, in 2019 the US was responsible for 38% of global military expenditure, totaling $732 billion. The increase over its 2018 budget alone amounted to the equivalent of Germany’s total expenditure in 2019. Experts see the increase as a response to China, which ranks in second place after the US when it comes to military spending. Beijing’s budget contributed 14% of global military expenditure in 2019 and rose by more than 5% to $261 billion. China has been increasing its military expenditure steadily since 1994, but its budget has jumped by 85% since 2010. However, in terms of percentage of GDP, this has not changed considerably and almost always lies at 1.9%.
Max Mutschler from the Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC), a peace and conflict research institute explained, “Military expenditure is based on worst-case scenarios.” He told DW that while the public often perceives economic conflict between states to be in the foreground, the threat of military conflict remains very present in the background.
“With regard to the tension between the US and China, we do not know if there will be an armed conflict or not. So the militaries in both countries are preparing for this eventuality, and they’re very good when it comes to lobbying for more funds,” he said.
Saudi Arabia lies well ahead of other Middle Eastern countries, spending $61.9 billion in 2019.
Military expenditure in other countries pales by comparison to the global top spenders. South American states spent “only” $53 billion in 2019, and Brazil alone was responsible for half of that.
Southeast Asian countries totaled around $41 billion.
And the entire continent of Africa spent some $42 billion. Uganda, for example, increased its budget by 52%.
The COVID-19 pandemic shows that we’ve got our priorities wrong. Keeping citizens safe is the greatest responsibility of any society. Citizens can only enjoy free, dignified lives when they are secure and prosperous. Since 2003, the world witnessed the SARS, H1N1, MERS, Ebola and Zika virus outbreaks. Nations, in others words, had ample time to prepare for the possibility of a pandemic. But governments got their priorities wrong and invested billions in arms rather than readying for a potential pandemic disaster. Increased military spending led to states diverting money away from health care systems, infrastructure networks and environmental protection measures. It is a fact long recognised and acknowledged even by capitalist politicians.
Nation-states have failed to recognize the biggest threats to our safety: pandemics, climate change
and environmental destruction and prefer to guard their global trade routes or raw material sources. The pandemic we are facing has made very clear just how globalized our world is today. Something happening in far-away countries can swiftly spread and affect people across the globe. Globalization cannot be wished away. It is here to stay. That means the global community must cooperate not compete and enter into conflict. Only then can our world become a safe place for all and we see the end of armies and armament industries.
The Nationalism of Vaccines
Yuan Qiong, senior legal and policy advisor at Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) Access Campaign explained “There shouldn’t be any patent monopoly and profiteering out of this pandemic.”
Rohingya Boat People
Foreign Minister AK Abdul Momen told Al Jazeera that the Rohingya refugees are “not Bangladesh’s responsibility.”
The two trawlers have already been refused safe harbour by Malaysia.
Norway’s Arctic Oil
Making money from death and suffering
Humanity’s way forward
For socialists, the food supply, a necessity for all, should rely on cooperation and not competition. Principles of solidarity should determine its production and distribution. Socialism which promotes life over profits must become the foundation of human civilisation. We are not living in such a world now, but we surely can. It is now the time to start building an equitable and just society. Wealth is in the hands of a few while the majority struggle simply to get by. People across the world are turning to their governments for desperately needed health services and financial support. The pandemic is thus strengthening state power and nationalism in many countries.
But now the inequalities and injustices are no longer invisible. Some are beginning to ask why are some rich and others poor (nations and people), why are some privileged and most not. Some now see that our system is designed to perpetuate rather than eradicate social divisions, and that must be changed.
COVID19 – Can the Market Bring the Cure?
The West African ebola crisis – an outbreak that killed
11,325 people – exposed its own galling market failure. As the death toll in West Africa grew and grew, big pharmaceuticals could not see a way to recoup the considerable losses they would face attempting to find a vaccine.
Lock and Load against Lockdown
“Reopen America” protest groups in various US states against recent coronavirus lockdown measures were set up by conservative gun lobbyists. The coordinated effort seems to be driven by the apparent long-term aim of building a larger base of support for gun law relaxation.
This widespread online activity has contributed toward the impression that there is large-scale opposition to the lockdown measures. In contrast, nearly 70% of Republican voters and 95 percent of Democratic voters supported a national stay-at-home order, according to recent research by Quinnipiac, a nationwide independent public opinion poll.
https://www.dw.com/en/revealed-how-the-us-gun-lobby-exploits-the-coronavirus-pandemic-to-further-its-aims/a-53230399
From Pandemic Emergency to the Emergence of Socialism
We should not return to the type of society that enabled this pandemic to emerge and spread. We must instead create a new socially just and sustainable world. We, working people, can shut the system down and we have the numbers to break the power of capitalist class and their State. We should send a clear signal that things cannot and must not return to normal. We must transform our broken and inequitable society, and build a new society run by and for us – the working class majority. We seek a world safe not for profit-making, but for people.
Capitalists maximise profits. Capitalism has proved extremely inefficient in its response to the virus. Why return to such a normal? Why fix capitalism yet again, given its cyclical crashes and costly requirement to keep fixing it? Absurd, isn’ it? The problem is the structure of capitalism and not the particular management team running the capitalist enterprise. Capitalists either cannot or will not hire because to do so is not profitable for them. Why reproduce capitalism that so undemocratically organizes its businesses. Why replace one group of employer dictators with another, when a better alternative exists? Why revert back to a profit system that generates social divisions and inequality, which is regularly unstable?