Author: cynical but optimistic

Pivotal moment for Burnham?

Westminster watchers were glued to the Holborn and St Pancras by-election, and none more so than new Prime Minister Andy Burnham, after a Conference speech laying out his ‘vision’ of undoing 40 years of Thatcherite privatisation and ‘wrong turns’.

Will he call a snap general election to secure a popular mandate for this vision? The Tories are nowhere, the far-right divided and mired in scandal, and the Greens have arguably damaged their prospects by passing a resolution that Zionism is racist.

Thrilling stuff, if you like domestic soap operas. But capitalism will continue regardless, just as socialists continue working for its abolition. Because only then will anything really change.

The Socialist Party of Great Britain – Part of the World Socialist Movement

Odd world isn’t it?

Vote for World Socialism

There will be a lot of noise about the Holborn and St. Pancras by election – Labour and the Greens competing over who can be trusted to handle the cost of living crisis. Neither, though, will address the root cause of the crisis, that society is run on behalf of those who own the land and factories.

Until these are brought into common ownership, there will be poverty and unemployment, as this is how the owners get us to work for them. Our aim is to get this message out through the noise. You can help punch through the noise by getting people to write World Socialism across their ballot paper.

Get in touch with us to find out other ways you can help

Wordsocialism/spgb/

Who is in control?

Balaclavaed men attended anti-migrant protests in Dover and Portsmouth claiming to be “patriots” taking back control from a “globalist, Marxist-communist, anti-Christian group that has ruled us for too long”.

Marxist-communists advocating global socialism and opposed to religious superstition would be an accurate description of our party, but to think we have somehow been in control shows confused thinking. Those in control of society are the capitalists, and governments are compelled to prioritise the needs of this asset-owning, profit-taking minority.

Our members are part of the working class majority. The only ‘power’ we have is to express our views and opinions. We condemn global capitalism (the cause of homelessness, poverty etc) while those on the far-right condemn those merely trying to escape from some of its consequences.

The Socialist Party of Great Britain – Part of the World Socialist Movement

Grunwick

Having just read The Rotters Club by Jonathon Coe which is set in and around Birmingham in the 1970s I was most interested in a piece therein where there is a description of a picket travelling down to London to support striking Grunwick workers. The description of the police violence that occurred is, subjective view, one of the best things in the book. The violence described is harrowing so a look into the Grunswick dispute was called for.

Grunwick Film Processing Laboratories was a non-union company processing 35mm film and other formats. You would post your film and remuneration of to the company and receive twenty or thirty six six by four glossy photos back from then.The majority of their workforce were female and Asian. Following a dismissal other workers joined a picket. Workers were advised to join the Association of Professional, Executive, Clerical and Computer Staff. In September 1976 13y striking workers were sacked. The strike lasted from August 1976 to July 1978. Its objective, union recognition, failed to materialise.

The below is from a Brave.com search, police violence at Grunwick.

The Grunwick dispute (1976–1978) was marked by extreme police violence, primarily involving the Metropolitan Police’s Special Patrol Group (SPG), which was deployed for the first time in an industrial dispute. The SPG, modeled on paramilitary units from Northern Ireland, employed aggressive tactics including charges into crowds, flying wedges, and physical assaults, such as dragging picketers by their hair or grabbing women, resulting in numerous injuries including broken bones.

Key details of the violence include:

High Arrests and Injuries: Over 550 arrests were made, the highest figure for an industrial dispute since the 1926 General Strike. On November 7, 1977, 243 picketers were injured (12 with broken bones) and 113 arrested in a single day.

Media Narrative: Mainstream media heavily focused on images of injured police officers (such as one with a head wound), which framed the narrative around picketer violence while often downplaying the severity of police brutality against predominantly South Asian female strikers.

State Coordination: The Labour government and Home Secretary Merlyn Rees supported the heavy police presence to enforce court injunctions against secondary picketing, with Prime Minister James Callaghan encouraging a proactive police response to suppress the mass demonstrations.

Escalation: Violence peaked during mass pickets in June and July 1977, where thousands of trade unionists and supporters clashed with police attempting to escort non-striking workers and lorries into the factory. 

Extract from the Socialist Standard December 1977

‘A year ago few people had heard of the dispute at the Grunwick film-processing laboratories; today, the effort of the strikers to win union recognition has become a national cause célèbre. The events surrounding the dispute have been obscured by the press, which would have us believe that Grunwick is some kind of elaborate game in which one side tries to drive a bus through a gateway and the other side tries to stop them. The principle involved is lost amid reports of how many policemen were injured and how many demonstrators arrested. It is also difficult because socialists, while seeing the trade-union struggle as necessary, also recognise its futility in terms of the revolutionary political action we call upon workers to take.

Members of the SPGB have attended the Grunwick demonstrations in order to sell literature and distribute a leaflet putting the Party’s view on the dispute. The first paragraph of that leaflet states:

The dispute at Grunwick will come to an end…but the class struggle will go on. The Socialist Party of Great Britain believes in the urgent need for workers to join together, not simply for the defensive right of union recognition, but for the purpose of organising for social revolution—NOW. The need for class unity for Socialism is the pressing task of the age.

That, above all else, is the message of the SPGB. To abandon it would be to abandon our claim to be socialists.’

Read full piece below

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2016/09/wage-labour-and-capital-case-of.html

Twenty Five Years On

From the Socialist Standard, October 2001
‘So, the line-up in the next – military – episode in the continuing struggle for control of the oil resources of the Middle East is, on the one side, a section of the local capitalist class using Islam to rally mass support and, on the other, the Western capitalist powers using “democracy” as their ideology to win mass support for war. But “Islamic State” versus “Democracy” is only the ideological smokescreen disguising the real issue at stake: control of oil resources and trade routes. It is not an issue worth the shedding of a single drop of working-class blood.
As Socialists we declare our opposition to both sides in this war and call on the working class of the world to unite to bring capitalism to a rapid end so that no more lives are sacrificed to further the economic interests of rival sections of the world capitalist class.’
Adam Buick

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-middle-east-connection-2001.html