In a guest post, Pramod Ranjan of Assam Central University reflects on the new annual budget of the Indian government and how it ignores the plight of the country’s poor in the wake of Covid-19.

Note: A lakh is 100,000. A crore is 100 lakh, i.e., 10 million.

Like in most parts of the world, life was on a stand-still in India for the past almost one year, courtesy of the Covid-19 pandemic. Now the poor and the middle class are in a miserable state. Crores have lost their jobs and lakhs have faced savage reductions in their income. Amid this crisis, the Government of India presented its annual budget in Parliament on February 1, 2021. 

Based on the statistics on global hunger, published by the UN during the lockdown, Oxfam had estimated that by the end of 2020, hunger linked to the lockdown may start claiming the life of 6,000–12,000 people every day. The naked dance of death has commenced and without much fuss it is spreading over a larger and larger area. Deaths due to poverty far exceed deaths attributable to Covid-19.1

Dark clouds of famine, described as ‘Covid-19 famine’, are hanging over the world. The United Nation World Food Program (WFP) has been consistently warning about it. It is believed that the impending famine would be one of the worst over the last 100 years and would spell calamity for the poor and the developing countries as also the war zones in the world. It is apprehended that this famine may lead to India emerging as a new epicenter of hunger. According to a survey conducted in December 2020, more than half of India’s people are eating less in comparison with the pre-Covid days. And most of them are Dalits [untouchables] and Adivasis [tribal people].2

What is even worse is that India’s intellectual class is totally oblivious to the spectre of death haunting the poor. The sickening odour of the rotting dead is not reaching the noses of the Indian media, social media and those in public life. It seems that our centuries-old heritage of social disparity and the economic inequality triggered by the globalization of economy have deepened the social fissures to such an extent that “we” are totally disinterested in what is happening to “them”.  

And this disinterest is very palpable in India’s budget for 2021–2022 and the discussions and comments on it in the media. 

The budget is focused on recompensing the losses suffered by the economy due to the pandemic. For this, it is proposed to sell off national assets to the capitalists. Media is obsessed with discussing only this aspect of the budget. Some say the decision is proper and necessary and the next logical step in the process of “economic reforms.” Others say that the government was out to sell the country. 

In her budget speech, the finance minister dwelt in detail on the budgetary provisions to ensure availability of Covid-19 vaccine in the country and the steps to be taken for making India a digital economy. The pros and cons of these moves are also being debated and discussed. 



But nobody is asking why the budget does not make even a cursory reference to the lockdown-induced starvation and the famine that is knocking on the door. No one is querying why there is not a single word in the budget speech about the economic inequalities that have triggered this crisis.

A couple of days before the presentation of the budget, Oxfam released a report titled The Inequality Virus. The report says that the coronavirus pandemic has increased inequality in almost every country. The wealth of the 1,000 super-rich of the world has grown by leaps and bounds during the pandemic. The share market did tumble in the initial days of the lockdown, leading to notional losses for the moneybags. But not only did the fortunes of the top-1,000 billionaires of the world reached to their pre-pandemic highs soon3 but they earned more than what they had earned in the past several years.  It was the exercise to build a digital world that led to this growing concentration of wealth in a few hands. The businesses in the health and the vaccine production sectors made tons of money. According to the Oxfam report, the lockdown period saw a jump of 19% in the wealth of the super-rich. Jeff Bezos, the richest person on the earth, became worth 185.5 billion US dollars. On 18 January 2021, Elon Musk’s total wealth was estimated at 179.2 billion dollars. The net wealth of Larry Page and Sergey Brin, founders of Google, and Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft, grew by 15 billion US dollars since March 2020. Eric Yuan, the CEO and founder of Zoom was richer by 2.58 billion dollars during this period.

There were eye-popping changes in the economic scene in India, too. Indian billionaires raked in big moolah during the lockdown. They reaped the benefits of the subsidy schemes announced by the government to give a boost to the economy. Locked up in their homes, the people handed over whatever little they had, to the big industrialists. Currently, India has 119 billionaires, including Mukesh Ambani, Gautam Adani, Shiv Nadar, Cyrus Poonawala, Uday Kotak, Azim Premji, Sunil Mittal, Radhakishen Damani, Kumarmanglam Birla and Laxmi Mittal. 

During this period, Mukesh Ambani emerged as the richest man in India and Asia. During the pandemic period, he earned an average of Rs 90 crore per hour when 24% of Indians were earning barely Rs 3,000 per month. 

The cumulative wealth of this 119 super-rich went up by 35% in this period. Together, they earned Rs 13 lakh crore. What this amount means is evident by the fact that if it were to be equally distributed among the 14 crore poorest Indians, each one of them would get Rs one lakh. The lockdown earnings of Mukesh Ambani could have sufficed to keep the 40 crore persons in the informal sector who lost their jobs during this period, above the poverty line for at least five months.4 

On the other hand, the lockdown pushed more than 12 crore Indians on the verge of starvation. The middle classes were unable to pay back their bank loans and lakhs of families, sick of harassment at the hands of their creditors, contemplated mass suicide. The government ignored the demand for extension of the moratorium on payment of EMIs. Before the budget, the government had made it clear to the Supreme Court that it was with the creditors. Shrugging off its responsibility, the government told the court that extension of the moratorium would erode the faith of the capitalists who have invested their money in the banks. There were reports of dozens of indebted families committing suicide and lakhs of creditors facing aggressive and abusive behaviour and even manhandling at the hands of the recovery agents of the banks and other financial institutions. 

The budget is totally silent on this issue.

A deafening silence 

Not only the government but the newspapers are also mum. And this is nothing new. The newspapers have been giving a short-shrift to issues related to economic inequality since the 1990s when India switched to a market-centric economy. Till the year 2000, India had just nine billionaires. By 2017, their numbers had swollen to 101, and as mentioned earlier, now there are 119 such worthies. According to a study, in 2017, the 1% of top-rich held 73% of the country’s national wealth. In 2018-19, the total wealth of these moneybags was more than the country’s annual budget. During the Covid calamity, they not only continued to fill their coffers without a shred of guilt or shame but institutions under their control used the pandemic to blackmail the people. 

The 10% of Indians at the top of the socio-economic pyramid control 77% of the national wealth, while the remaining 90% have to manage with just 23%. 

One very potent way of reducing this inequality could have been imposing wealth tax and making sure that all the concerned pay up. This would have made good the losses due to the lockdown. The super-rich should have been taxed on the basis of their annual income and an additional cess should have been imposed on them based on their total wealth. Instead, in the name of disinvestment, the government decided to hand over the country’s national wealth to these moneybags. This is akin to worsening the problem instead of resolving it.  

New York, California, Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington and many other states in the USA are planning to impose additional taxes on the rich.5

A Bill has been recently introduced in the legislature of the Washington State to impose Wealth Tax on the rich to repair the economy ravaged by the lockdown.6 If this bill is cleared, those owning property worth more than one billion dollars would be required to pay a 1% wealth tax. That would yield an income of 2.5 billion dollars, which would be used for providing financial assistance to the low- and the middle-income households and extending credit facilities to businesses with poor profit margins. It would also be used for education, children’s welfare and for bettering public health, public housing and public security. Like India, Washington, too, has around 100 billionaires of which 13 are super-rich. They include the likes of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer and MacKenzie Scott. The Bill has been moved primarily to tax them. Of the revenue expected from the new tax, 97% would come from them. This super-rich earned upwards of 151 billion dollars during the lockdown period (March 2020 – January 21) and their total wealth went up by around 41%. The people of Washington, supporting the decision to impose wealth tax on them, say that the earnings can cover the shortfall of three billion dollars in the state’s budget 50 times over. And despite the tax, the super-rich would continue to be as rich as they were before the pandemic struck.7 The demand for taxing them has assumed the form of a movement and it is hoped that the bill would be cleared by the legislature soon. 

You might remember that some dynamic and sensitive officers of the Indian Revenue Service (IRS) had suggested a similar course of action during the initial days of the pandemic. That was the time when lakhs of migrant farmers were trudging to their villages from industrial towns like Delhi, Mumbai and Surat and there were reports that fatigue had claimed the lives of hundreds of them on the way. Amid this came a piece of news that seemed like a whiff of fresh air. Around 50 officers informed on the Twitter Account of the IRS Association that they have prepared a report titled FORCE (Fiscal Options and Response to the Covid-19 epidemic).

The report was a personal effort on the part of the officers, who suggested a course of action for the government. The report said, “In times like these, the so-called super-rich have a higher obligation towards ensuring the larger public good.” The officers proposed that income tax rates be raised for the rich and an additional Covid Relief Cess be levied on those earning more than a specified amount. The report said that cases of non-filing of returns, not deducing tax at source, not depositing TDS in government accounts and reducing tax liability by making fake claims of losses keep on cropping up. Thus, it would be appropriate to increase tax rates from 30 to 40% for those with an annual income of more than Rs one crore and wealth tax or property tax on those whose annual income is more than Rs 5 crore. 

These officers were neither Communists nor revolutionaries seeking a fundamental change in the system. They proposed merely that some new taxes be imposed temporarily to bring the country’s economy back on the rails and to ensure that the poor and the middle classes have cash in their hands so as to give a boost to trade and commerce. 

The super-rich realized that this could be the thin end of the wedge. They were rattled and soon, stories began appearing in the media insinuating that these officers were guilty of gross indiscipline. Articles were carried arguing that such measures would infuriate the rich and promote tax evasion. The government got cracking and three senior IRS officers were penalized by shifting them from their posts. The government said that more than the young officers, it was their seniors who were responsible for this breach of discipline as they had provoked the former to prepare the report8. The officers held guilty were Prashant Bhushan, principal commissioner of income tax, Delhi; Prakash Dubey, director DOPT, Delhi and Sanjay Bahadur, principal director, investigation, northeast region.

No one praised the sensitivity of these officers and their dedication to duty. No editorial was written in their support and no TV debates were held. No one raised the question that when these officers had neither criticized the government nor imposed any new tax on their own but had only made some suggestions for consideration by the government, how were they guilty of indiscipline? If any officer had suggested imposition of higher taxes on the poor or the middle classes, would that have been considered an act of indiscipline?

They did not get any support from the media. No civil society organization came out in their support and neither did any caste or religious organization back them. Neither the Communist parties spoke in their favour nor socialists or the pro-social justice Ambedkarites. No one said that these diligent and visionary officers had realized much before the Communist parties, who talk of the proletariat at the drop of hat, and the economists, experts in making all sorts of predictions by juggling figures, that the coming months would witness an increasing concentration of wealth into a few hands.    

Be that as it may, the world of which the super-rich dream is a world in which there would be no place for questions. They want a world in which everyone has food to eat, clothes to wear and a roof over his head. But they do not want anyone to question the inequality that informs our world, due to which people are stressed all their lives and no one seems happy. They don’t want to know why some people are dying bit by bit. And why some human communities are disappearing from the face of the earth. If we want to ensure that the world of their dreams doesn’t become a reality, we should continue to ask questions, we should welcome all legitimate questions against them, no matter who raises them. As a beginning, we should try taking the questions raised by the IRS officers to the people. 

Pramod Ranjan is interested in studying the working of media organizations, philosophy of knowledge and analysis of the ignored aspects of literature, culture and society. He is an assistant professor in the Rabindranath Tagore School of Language and Culture Studies of the Assam Central University.



Contact: +91-9811884495, janvikalp@gmail.com

References 

[1] Oxfam Media Briefing, “The Hunger Virus: How Covid-19 Is Fuelling Hunger In A Hungry World,” July 9, 2020.

[2]  Shagun Kapil (2020) “COVID-19 lockdowns may be over but poor still go hungry”, Down to Earth, December 9, 2020.

[3]  Reliefweb (2021) “The Inequality Virus: Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy”, January 25, 2021.

[4] Esmé Berkhout, Nick Galasso, Max Lawson et al., “The Inequality Virus”, Oxfam, January 25, 2021.

[5] CNBC, “Taxes are likely to go up for the wealthy in these nine states”, SEP 25 2020.

[6] Washington state legislature Bill-HB 1406 – 2021-22 “Improving the equity of Washington state’s tax code by creating the Washington state wealth tax and taxing extraordinary financial intangible assets.”

[7] Americansfortaxfairness.org, “Washington Billionaires Got $151 Billion Richer Over First 10 Months of Pandemic, Their Collective Wealth Jumping Nearly One-Half”, February 2, 2021.

[8] “Finance Ministry Slams IRS Officers’ Proposal on Levying a COVID-19 Wealth Tax.” The Wire, 27 Apr. 2020.

Taken from the WSPUS website

India: turning a deaf ear to misery and despair | World Socialist Party of the US (wspus.org)

 Arconic, the company that made the Grenfell Tower cladding told a “misleading half-truth” to a British standards board, its boss has accepted. It only shared one successful fire test result with the British Board of Agrément (BBA), and not a failed result.

 Chemicals giant DuPont decided to sell a plant in south Louisiana that emits a likely cancer causing pollutant, citing “major concerns” that government agencies would regulate its emissions to protect the community living nearby.  The multibillion-dollar company worried in 2011 about the potential cost of offsetting its emissions of the “likely human carcinogen”, chloroprene, and so moved to sell the plant, the Pontchartrain Works facility. The company also withheld details of its own research to offset emissions from the plant’s new owners, the Japanese chemical company Denka.

According to the EPA, the majority Black community have the highest risk of cancer due to airborne pollution anywhere in the US, over 50 times the national average, primarily due to chloroprene emissions. 

“They prioritize profits over people. They come to your neighborhoods and give you as little information as possible,” said Lydia Gerard, another resident who lost her husband to cancer in 2018. “To me this shows that DuPont thought, ‘Let’s see how long we can get away with it in this community before anyone finds out and says anything about it.”

“They [DuPont] should have told us. They have a good-neighbour policy but they were not trying to change anything. They were going to go for another 50 years if this [potential government regulation] hadn’t come to light,” said Mary Hampton, a resident who lives a few hundred feet from the plant.

DuPont argue it cannot be held liable as it no longer owns the plant, despite opening the facility and polluting the air with chloroprene for nearly half a century.

“It was a money decision to continue contaminating a community, when in fact the technology was there to implement the controls to operate the facility safely. And they [DuPont] chose not to do it because of the price tag,” said Hugh Lambert, a lawyer working for the plaintiffs.

Revealed: chemicals giant sold Louisiana plant amid fears over cost of offsetting toxic emissions | US news | The Guardian

 In Australia, at least 11 billionaires last year received lucrative dividends totalling tens of millions of dollars from companies that received jobkeeper subsidies designed to keep workers employed.

The average Australian billionaire’s wealth increased by 59% over the past year, while workers struggled with wage stagnation and a spike in unemployment caused by the pandemic.

Harvey Norman paid dividends of $74.7m, of which Harvey, who is worth $2.57bn, was entitled to $23.5m.

John Gandel, the founder of Melbourne shopping centre Chadstone, who is worth $5.4bn. He and his family own about 15.2% of shopping centre group Vicinity, which received about $10.8m in jobkeeper.

Brett Blundy, who built a retail empire from a record store called Disco Duck and is now estimated to be worth $2.2bn, received an estimated $6.48m in dividends from his shares in youth-focused jewellery chain Lovisa.

James Packer, who is estimated to be worth $4.69bn. His private company, Consolidated Press Holdings, owns 34% of Crown, which received about $110m in jobkeeper subsidies – almost $70m of which was passed directly on to employees who had been stood down, at no net benefit to the company.

The family of poker machine magnate Len Ainsworth, who is worth $4.42bn, also received dividends from the company he founded, Aristocrat Leisure. Aristocrat received $11m in jobkeeper and paid dividends of $63.9m.

Nick Politis, who is worth $1.31bn, also received a dividend paid within weeks of the announcement of jobkeeper.

Marc Besen and his family, who are worth $2.24bn, received dividends from property group Home Consortium. The company received $200,000 in jobkeeper.

Other billionaires entitled to dividends from companies that received jobkeeper were Dale Elphinstone (worth $1.08bn), who has a large interest in engineering and labour hire group Engenco, and Raphael Geminder, who is the chairman of packaging company Pact Group.

Billionaires receive tens of millions in dividends from companies on jobkeeper | Business | The Guardian

 Government failure to maintain the £20 a week Covid top-up payment for universal credit will overwhelmingly hit the incomes of working and disabled people, and put more than 700,000 into poverty, according to the Fabian Society.

If the planned cuts to universal credit and tax credits go ahead it will put 760,000 people below the poverty line over the medium term. Of these, 490,000 (64%) will be in working households where at least one adult works, many with children.

Its analysis of how the cut impacts on different households concludes that households with a disabled adult will be hit by 57% of the cuts; families with children will be hit by half ; and households where someone is a carer will be hit by 12%.

Andrew Harrop, general secretary of the Fabian Society, said: 

“If ministers cut universal credit this April, they will overwhelmingly punish working families and disabled people. People in these groups have shown huge resilience during the pandemic and have done nothing to deserve this. The chancellor’s planned cut will strip £1,000 per year from 6 million families and plunge three quarters of a million people into poverty. Some politicians like to pretend that social security is just for the workshy. But the reality is that millions of working households need benefits and tax credits to make ends meet, as do disabled people who are out of work through no fault of their own. If ministers are considering a few months’ temporary extension to the universal credit uplift, that just isn’t good enough. The 2020 benefit increase must be placed on a permanent footing.”

Cutting Covid top-up ‘will put 700,000 people into poverty’ | Universal credit | The Guardian

  Biden’s officials, fearing a surge in immigration, has sent out the message that little will change quickly for migrants arriving at the southern US border, even if there is a softer reception for them.

The World Food Programme says three million Hondurans face food insecurity, six times higher than before the hurricanes. The dual hurricanes Iota and Eta affected an estimated four million of 10 million Honduran people. 

Dana Graber Ladek, head of the International Organization for Migration office in Mexico, explained, “They’re suffering poverty, violence, the hurricanes, unemployment, domestic violence, and with that dream of a new administration, of new opportunities, they’re going to try [to migrate] again and again.”

 Okonjo-Iweala, the World Trade Organization’s incoming chief on Monday warned against “vaccine nationalism’ that would slow progress in ending the COVID-19 pandemic and could erode economic growth for all countries – rich and poor.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe. Vaccine nationalism at this time just will not pay, because the variants are coming. If other countries are not immunized, it will just be a blow back,” she said. “It’s unconscionable that people will be dying elsewhere, waiting in a queue, when we have the technology.”

Okonjo-Iweala said studies showed that the global economy would lose $9 trillion in potential output if poor countries were unable to get their populations vaccinated quickly, and about half of the impact would be borne by rich countries.

“Both on a human health basis, as well as an economic basis, being nationalistic at this time is very costly to the international community,” she said.

Incoming WTO head warns ‘vaccine nationalism’ could slow pandemic recovery | Reuters

 There are many media articles condemning the Chinese secrecy over the origins in Wuhan of the COVID-19 outbreak. They are accused of suppressing data concerning it and the local and national officials handling of it. Such lack of transparency has led to a number of conspiracy theories.

In contrast, the secrecy and with-holding of information by the pharmaceutical companies is treated as normal custom and practice regardless to the risk to lives patents and intellectual ownership creates. 

Wealthy nations and the vaccine manufacturers are engaged in contract disputes over supplies. Nations compete with one another for commitment by the drug corporations to fulfil their advance orders for the vaccines. 

Rich countries have ordered enough doses to vaccinate their populations three times over, while 9 in 10 people in nearly 70 poorer countries are unlikely to be vaccinated at all this year. We know that when it comes to Covid infection and prevalence, nobody is safe until we are all safe. But the efforts of almost every rich country to secure vaccines reminds us of first-class passengers receiving privileged treatment.

Getting the vaccine to the world’s poor will require an approach based on solidarity rather than competition. 

 People living in poverty around the world are in danger of food shortages as the coronavirus crisis continues, Agnes Kalibata, the special envoy to the UN secretary general for the food systems summit 2021, has warned, with the risk worse this year than in the period shortly after the pandemic began.

 She said, “Food systems have contracted, because of Covid-19. And food has become more expensive and, in some places, out of reach for people. Food is looking more challenging this year than last year. The main impact has been on markets, the shutdown of food markets. The lockdown has closed markets and that makes it very difficult for farmers.” She explained that “Last year, many countries used whatever opportunity they had to keep their food systems going. That is more difficult now. Food prices have increased significantly in some places.”

Kalibata highlighted the plight of African countries in particular, several of which are facing serious food price rises and shortages, exacerbated by problems such as drought predicted in east Africa, likely to affect northern Kenya, Somalia and Ethiopia. “This year, the predicted drought cycle is much more serious than last year,” she said.

Other countries were also seeing prices rise, she added. “The price of food is increasing in some cases very fast, which is really challenging.” As the coronavirus pandemic and the global economic crisis it has provoked continue, more countries are likely to be drawn into difficulties, she said. “We have not been able to strengthen our reserves. Now they are under pressure.”

Munderlying problems have grown worse over the past year, as people have exhausted their reserves of food, cash and family support and now are facing a long crisis without backup.

“We are facing a greater threat this year, as economies have shrunk,” she said. “That is happening across the globe, everywhere. Countries are in a very distressed situation, and it is not getting easier – it is getting more difficult. Some countries have hung on, but for how long?”

Risk of global food shortages due to Covid has increased, says UN envoy | World news | The Guardian

 Food has been speculated on the financial markets for a very long time. In December, water also became a commodity which can now be traded in the Wall St futures market. Now another basic of life is being speculated over for profit and private gain – oxygen, itself.

  With most hospitals full, many Mexicans are battling COVID-19 oxygen tanks and oxygen concentrators (devices that concentrate the oxygen from a gas supply, typically the air) have become scarce, as individuals and companies are taking advantage of the pandemic and selling or renting them at extremely high prices. Others are using the situation to fraudulently sell tanks without delivering them.

In Mexico City, people have been lining up for up to five hours to refill tanks, many of which only provide a few hours’ worth of oxygen. The demand for oxygen has grown by 700 percent over the past month. Oxygen products have roughly quadrupled in prices since November. Now some companies sell industrial oxygen tanks that aren’t medical grade and thus not fit for personal use.

Profiting From Desperation: Oxygen Tanks Become an Underground Market in Mexico (truthout.org)